In:Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 105–142
A Role and Reference Grammar parser for German
Published online: 1 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.05die
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.05die
This paper describes the development of a sentence parser for German based on Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). German has a number of characteristics which are very challenging to a computational approach to syntactic processing that is semantically motivated. These include the German sentence structure, which is organised as a “bracket structure”, in which one component of the predicate, mostly the finite verb, is realised in an early position in the sentence and therefore forms the “left bracket”, whereas the more meaningful part of the predicate, mostly the infinite predicate, appears at the end of the sentence and forms the “right bracket”. Inside these brackets, the main information of the sentence is placed in an order that reflects information structure, i.e. the given information precedes the new information inside the bracket. The bracket structure has recurrent formal elements. It therefore provides a formal structuring principle for sentences that is particular for German and serves functions for sentence processing, information structure and turn taking. German has a three-way gender system for nouns. Gender is marked on the article. Tense is marked on the verb. There is an aspectual system in the realisation of perfect in that telic verbs select sein in the perfect, while atelic verbs select haben. The software is developed using Java and will accept an input sentence in German from the user through a Java Swing graphical user interface. The software parses an input sentence into its respective tokens using the Java native string processing capability. Each token is checked against the respective German lexicons (noun, verb, etc.) to determine its lexical category. The morphological markings of the tokens are unpacked for their feature sets. These features are recorded for each token. The lexical entry for the verb is determined and its logical structure is retrieved from the lexicon. The result of the parse displays the populated RRG logical structure and its operators, i.e. tense, aspect etc. A trace of the application of the linking system, in mapping from syntactic clause to semantic representation, is presented.
References (19)
Deitel, Paul J. & Deitel, Harvey. 2012.
Java How to Program
, 9th edn. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Education International.
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2008. Where is the PreCore slot? Mapping the layered structure of the clause and German sentence topology. In
Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface
[Studies in Language Companion Series 105], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Towards a reconsideration of Constructional Schemas in RRG: Are all constructions driven by “constructions”? In Proceedings of the 10th International RRG Conference (RRG 2009), Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 52–79. <[URL]>
. 2011. The theoretical importance of constructional schemas in RRG. In
Proceedings of the RRG 2009 Conference
, 168–198. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
. 2013a. Auxiliary selection in German: Constructional gradience with perfect formation. In
Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples/Capri Papers
[Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo (eds), 405–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013b. From idioms to sentence structures and beyond: The theoretical scope of the concept “Construction”. In
Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammars
[Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 295–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grewendorf, Günther, Hamm, Fritz & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1994.
Sprachliches Wissen
. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
Ronneberger-Siebold, Elke. 1991. Funktionale Betrachtungen zu Diskontinuität und Klammerbildung im Deutschen. In
Beiträge zum 8. Bochum-Essener Kolloquium über 'Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien'
, Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger, Benedikt Jeßing, Thomas Stolz (eds). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
., Robert D. & Diedrichsen, Elke. 2006.
A Bonsai Grammar for German
. <[URL]>
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco J. & Ana Díaz-Galán
Diedrichsen, Elke
2017. Pleonasm in particle verb constructions in German. In Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events [Studies in Language Companion Series, 180], ► pp. 43 ff.
Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco José
Diederichsen, Elke
2015. Degrees of causivity in German lassen causitive constructions. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167], ► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
