In:Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 291–316
Modal particles in causal clauses
The case of German weil wohl
Published online: 24 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.10sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.10sch
It is well-known that modal particles are not only licensed in root clauses, but also in a proper subset of embedded clauses. However, most existing accounts are primarily concerned with syntactic licensing conditions of modal particles in embedded clauses, while their semantic aspects remain relatively unexplored. This article focuses on a particularly intriguing set of cases in which the commitment-weakening German modal particle wohl occurs in veridical contexts created by the causal connective weil, as in Er hat ein schlechtes Gewissen, weil er wohl gelogen hat. We argue that this combination gives rise to a rather complex interpretation that is unexpected given standard assumptions about modal particles and causal clauses, schematically ‘p and assume(speaker)(q) and (if q then cause(q)(p))’ for sentences of the form ‘p weil wohl q’, and we sketch a possible route for compositional interpretation of these constructions in a dynamic framework based on speaker commitments.
References (41)
Abraham, Werner. 1991. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Diskurspartikel zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33–77. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
. 2012a. Satzabhängigkeit und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In Discourse and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, Johan Brandtler; David Håkansson; Stefan Huber & Eva Klingvall (eds), 1–27. Lund: University of Lund.
. 2012b. Sprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 2012(1): 72–95.
. 2012c. Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? (to appear 2014 In Studia Linguistica).
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation: Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 1–37.
Asbach-Schnitker, Brigitte. 1977. Die Satzpartikel wohl: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Verwendungsbedingungen im Deutschen und ihrer Wiedergabemöglichkeiten im Englischen. In Aspekte der Modalpartikeln: Studien zur deutschen Abtönung, Harald Weydt (ed.), 38–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Coniglio, Marco. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Davis, Christopher, Potts, Christopher & Speas, Margaret. 2007. The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. In Proceedings of SALT 17, Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds), 71–88. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, NF 100: 25–50.
Frey, Werner. 2011. Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfung: Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion, Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Grosz, Patrick. To appear. German ‘doch’: An element that triggers a contrast presupposition. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 46. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317–339.
. 2012. The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haider, Hubert. 2000. Adverb placement – convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134.
Heycock, Caroline. 2005. Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 2, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.
Krifka, Manfred. 2012. Embedding speech acts. In Recursion in language and cognition, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds).
<[URL]>
Larson, Richard. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and ‘scope.’ In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), 23–43. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Larson, Richard & Sawada, Miyuki. 2012. Root transformations and quantificational structure. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meibauer, Jörg. 1994. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln [Linguistische Arbeiten 314]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Pittner, Karin. 1999. Adverbiale im Deutschen: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Reis, Marga. 1997. Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Christa Dürscheid, Karl Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2006. Is German V-to-C movement really semantically motivated? Some empirical problems. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 369–380.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 1991. Causal and purposive clauses. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 1: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. Zum ‘Wohl’: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren. Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2023. Layers of subordinate clauses. In Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses [Studies in Language Companion Series, 231], ► pp. 184 ff.
Frey, Werner
2023. Types of German causal clauses and their syntactic-semantic layers. In Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses [Studies in Language Companion Series, 231], ► pp. 51 ff.
Tan, Jennifer & Johannes Mursell
2018. Embedding evidence in Tagalog and German. In
Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 185 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
