Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (60)
References
Aboh, Enoch Oladé. 2006. Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(1): 1–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2002. Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Preface. In Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language, Karl Bühler, xii–xlvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. (Inter)subjectification or foreign consciousness/Other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualizations and data fidelity. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Illocutive Force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. Introduction. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 1–23. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. A book review of Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds). 2010. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Studies in Language 36(2): 431–439.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 373–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue/Tense and Point of View, Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmovski (eds), 213–246. Paris: Université Paris X - Nanterre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua 116: 2023–2067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911. Handbook of American Indian Languages. Washington DC: GPO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bojadzhiev, Todor et al.. 1999. Syvremenen Bylgarski Ezik (Modern Bulgarian Language). Sofia: Petar Beron.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. [1934]2011. Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. Transl. Donald Fraser Goodwin. 2nd rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Bare phrase structure. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Hector Campos & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 383–439. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–66. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds) 51–65. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Evidentials: Semantics and history. In Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 1–12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culy, Christopher. 1994a. Aspects of logophoric marking. Linguistics 32: 1055–1094. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994b. A note on logophoricity in Dogon. Journal of African Linguistics 15: 113–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Logophoric pronouns and point of view. Linguistics 35: 845–859. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2001. The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2): 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 2004. Rethinking past tense. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Gueron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 203–15. Camebridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitneva, Stanka. 2008. The role of evidentiality in Bulgarian children’s reliability judgements. Journal of Child Language 35: 845–868. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 2006. Another look at li placement in Bulgarian. The Linguistic Review 23: 161–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & Holloway King, Tracy. 2000. A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor. 1982. Reportedness in Bulgarian: Category or stylistic variant? International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 25–26: 149–163.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds),168–87. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Hunting the elusive evidential: The third-person auxiliary as a Boojum in Bulgarian. In Of all the Slavs my Favorites: Studies in Honor of Howard Aronson on the Occasion of his 66th Birthday [Indiana Slavic Studies 12], Donald L. Dyer & Victor Friedman (eds), 203–230. Bloomington IN: Slavica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gül, Demet. 2009. Semantics of Turkish evidential -(I)ml?. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Essays on Turkish Linguistics, Sıla Ay, Özgür Aydın, İclâl Ergenç, Seda Gökmen, Selçuk İşsever & Dilek Peçenek (eds), 177–186. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In SALT VII, A. Lawson & E. Cho (eds.), 222–239. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. [1957]1971. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 130–47. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1984. Focus and modality. In Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks on ‘Topic, Focus, and Configurationality’, 6–8 April, 1984, Vol. 1, Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Mey (eds). GAGL 24: 55–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koev, Todor. 2011. Evidentiality and temporal distance learning. In Proceedings of SALT 21, 115–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique.1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20(4): 555–588.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana. 2001. Subjunctives in Bulgarian and Modern Greek. In Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, Maria.-Luisa Rivero & Angela Ralli (eds), 105–127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 37–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. [1986]2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliana Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2002. The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 125–55. Oxford: UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 445–479.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004. The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Rivista di Linguistica 16(1): 219–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Holmberg, Anders. 2008. Icelandic dative intervention: Person and number are separate probes. In Agreement restrictions, Roberta D'Alessandro, Susan Fischer & Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson (eds), 251–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan&Aksu, Ayhan 1982. Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Tense-aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics [Typological Studies in Language 1], Paul Hopper (ed.) 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Asymmetry in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Levy, Yonata 1999. Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1977. Hierarchies of person. In Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Woodford A. Beach, Samuel E. Fox & Shulamith Philosoph (eds), 714–733. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue