In:Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 153–190
The reconstruction of inflectional classes in morphology
History, method and Pama-Nyungan (Australian) verbs
Published online: 28 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.08koc
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.08koc
This paper surveys the approaches that have been taken to the synchronic description of the inflectional classes of verbs of the Pama-Nyungan family of Australian languages, highlighting problems with the application of the concept of the morpheme, and the notion of “conjugation markers”. It then summarizes and critically assesses attempts to reconstruct the prehistory of Pama-Nyungan verb inflection, considering primarily the contrasting approaches of Dixon (1980, 2002) and Alpher (1990). The methodological requirements for such a reconstruction are then discussed. Finally, the proposed principles are applied first to the internal reconstruction of verbs in Walmajarri, a language of the Ngumpin-Yapa subgroup, then to the comparative reconstruction of some Pama-Nyungan (monosyllabic) verbs that display heterogeneous patterns of inflection.
References (55)
Alpher, Barry.1990. Some Proto-Pama-Nyungan paradigms: A verb in the hand is worth two in the phylum. In
Studies in Comparative Pama-Nyungan
[Pacific Linguistics C-111], Geoffrey N. O’Grady & Darrell T. Tryon (eds), 155–171. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2004. Pama-Nyungan: Phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. In
Australian Languages. Classification and the Comparative Method
[Current Issues of Linguistic Theory 249], Claire Bowern & Harold Koch (eds), 93–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2005. Review article: R.M.W. Dixon, Australian Languages
.
Their Nature and Development
( Cambridge: University Press, 2002).
Language in Society
34: 795–805.
Alpher, Barry, Evans, Nicholas & Harvey, Mark.2003. Proto Gunwinyguan verb suffixes. In
The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia. Comparative Studies of the Continent’s Most Linguistically Complex Region
[Pacific Linguistics 552], Nicholas Evans (ed.), 305–352. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Anderson, Stephen R.1992.
A-morphous morphology
[Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62]. Cambridge: CUP.
Anttila, Raimo.1989.
Historical and Comparative Linguistics
, 2nd
revised edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bloomfield, Leonard.1939. Menomini morphophonemics.
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague
8: 105–15.
Bowern, Claire.2009. Conjugational class stability: Charting the history of conjugation classes in Yol?u languages. Paper presented to the19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Nijmegen, 10–14 August 2009.
Campbell, Lyle.1996. On sound change and challenges to regularity. In
The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change
, Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds), 72–89. Oxford: OUP.
Dench, Alan.1998. What is a Ngayarta language? A reply to O’Grady and Laughren.
Australian Journal of Linguistics
18: 91–107.
2003. From purposive/future to present: Shifting temporal categories in the Pilbara languages of north west Western Australia. In
Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 13–17 August 2001
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds), 87–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Douglas, Wilfrid H.1964.
An Introduction to the Western Desert language
[Oceania Linguistic Monographs 4]. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Garrett, Andrew.2008. Paradigm uniformity and markedness. In
Linguistic Universals and Language Change
, Jeff Good (ed.), 125–143. Oxford: OUP.
Goddard, Cliff.1985.
A Grammar of Yankunytjatjara
. Alice Springs NT: Institute for Aboriginal Development.
Green, Rebecca.2003. Proto Maningrida within Proto Arnhem: Evidence from verbal inflectional suffixes. In
The non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia. Comparative Studies of the Continent's Most Linguistically Complex Region
[Pacific Linguistics 552] Nicholas Evans (ed.), 369–421. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Hale, Kenneth.1976. Wik reflections of Middle Paman phonology. In
Languages of Cape York
, Peter Sutton (ed.), 50–60. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle.1995.
Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective
. Cambridge: CUP.
Harvey, Mark.2008. The origin of conjugation markers. In
Morphology and Language History: In Honour of Harold Koch
, Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds), 123–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heath, Jeffrey.1980.
Basic Materials in Ritharngu. Grammar, Texts and Dictionary
[Pacific Linguistics B-62]. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
1990. Verbal inflection and macro-subgroupings of Australian languages: The search for conjugation markers in non-Pama-Nyungan. In
Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology
, Philip Baldi (ed.), 403–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian.1996.
Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship. An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hudson, Joyce.1978.
The Core of Walmatjari Grammar
. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Koch, Harold.1990. Do Australian languages really have morphemes? Issues in Kaytej morphology. In
Language and History. Essays in Honour of Luise A. Hercus
[Pacific Linguistics C-116], Peter Austin, Robert M.W. Dixon, Tom Dutton & Isobel White (eds), 193–208. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
1995The creation of morphological zeroes. In
Yearbook of Morphology 1994
, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 31–71. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
1996. Reconstruction in morphology. In
The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change
, Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds), 218–263. Oxford: OUP.
2000. Order and disorder in the reconstruction of the ablaut pattern of athematic verbs in Proto-Indo-European. In
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles June 4–6, 1999
[Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series No.35], Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld & Angela Della Volpe (eds), 251–266. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
2003. Morphological reconstruction as an etymological method. In
Historical Linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 13–17 August 2001
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory ], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds), 271–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2008. R.H. Mathews’ schema for the description of Australian languages. In
Encountering Aboriginal Languages. Studies in the History of Australian Linguistics
[Pacific Linguistics 591], William B. McGregor (ed.), 179–218. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2009. On reconstructing pronominal proto-paradigms: Methodological considerations from the Pama-Nyungan language family of Australia. In
Discovering History through Language. Papers in Honour of Malcolm Ross
[Pacific Linguistics 605], Bethwyn Evans (ed.), 317–344. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2011a. Morphological change. In
The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences
, Patrick Colm Hogan (ed.), 514–515. Cambridge: CUP.
2011b. Teaching historical linguistics: A personal memoir. In
Teaching Linguistics. Reflections on Practice
, Koenraad Kuiper (ed.), 66–86. London: Equinox.
Lass, Roger.1977. Internal reconstruction and generative phonology.
Transactions of the Philological Society
(1975):1–26.
Lissarrague, Amanda.2010.
A Grammar and Dictionary of Gadhang
. Nambucca Heads NSW: Muurrbay Aboriginal Language & Culture Co-operative.
Maiden, Martin, Andrew Swearingen & Paul O’Neill. 2009. Imperative morphology in diachronic evidence from Romance languages. In
Historical linguistics 2007. Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 308], Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis & Etleva Vocaj (eds), 99–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matthews, Peter Hugo.1972.
Inflectional Morphology. A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation
[Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 6]. Cambridge: CUP.
Meillet, Antoine. [1954]1967.
The Comparative Method in Historical Linguistics
, translated byGordon B. Ford, Jr.Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.
Morelli, Steve.2008.
Gumbaynggirr Dictionary and Learner’s Grammar = Gumbaynggirr bijaar jandaygam, ngaawa gugaarrigam
. Nambucca Heads NSW: Muurrbay Aboriginal Language & Culture Co-operative
O’Grady, Geoff N.1990. Prenasalisation in Pama-Nyungan. In
Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology
, Philip Baldi (ed.), 451–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Osthoff, Hermann & Brugmann, Karl. [1878]1967. Preface to morphological investigations in the sphere of the Indo-European languages. In
A Reader in Nineteenth-century Historical Indo-European Linguistics
, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 197–209. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Richards, Eirlys & Hudson, Joyce.1990.
Walmajarri-English Dictionary
. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Robinson, George Augustus.2000
The Papers of George Augustus Robinson, Chief Protector, Port Phillip Aboriginal Protectorate, Vol 2: Aboriginal Vocabularies, South East Australia, 1839–1852
, Ian D. Clark (ed.). Clarendon VIC: Heritage Matters.
Simpson, Jane.2001. Preferred word order and the grammaticalization of Associated Path. In
Time over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax
[Studies in Constraint-based Lexicalism], Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 173–208. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Simpson, Jane & Hercus, Luise.2004. Thura-Yura as a subgroup. In
Australian Languages. Classification and the Comparative Method
[Current Issues in Linguisic Theory 249], Claire Bowern & Harold Koch (eds), 179–206, 581–646. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Ennever, Thomas & Mitchell Browne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
