In:Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 99–122
Liminal pronoun systems
Evidence from Garrwa
Published online: 28 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.06mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.06mus
Pronoun systems are often described as a single linguistic category consisting of a paradigm of forms that serve as referential indices, or as “dual” systems consisting of more than one paradigm. In dual systems, a paradigm of “bound” pronouns serves the basic referential functions usually for core grammatical functions, with a paradigm of free pronouns used in contexts of emphasis or contrast, and in oblique grammatical roles (Bresnan 2001; Mushin & Simpson 2008). The same kinds of pragmatic splits can be systematically signalled in single pronoun system for example by means of prosody. Bresnan (2001: 4) claims that a system is only dual when there is a divergence in both form and syntactic distribution. In this chapter I examine the usefulness of this claim in defining pronoun systems as dual (or not dual) using evidence from Garrwa (Northern Australia). Here I argue that Garrwa pronouns function as a liminal system, neither single nor dual. This analysis raises questions about the degree to which categorical distinctions can be made in language description. I also consider implications this has for understanding the typology of pronouns more generally.
References (31)
Austin, Peter & Bresnan, Joan.1996. Nonconfigurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
14: 215–268.
Belfrage, Hugh.1992. Aspects of Verb and Pronoun Morphology, Semantics and Syntax in Garrwa. Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.
Blake, Barry.1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language.
Australian Journal of Linguistics
3(2): 143–175.
1990. Languages of the Queensland/Northern Territory Border: Updating the Classification. In
Language and History: Essays in Honour of Luise A. Hercus
, Peter Austin, Robert M.W. Dixon, Tom Dutton & Isobel White (eds), 49–66. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Breen, Gavan.2003. Wanyi and Garrwa comparative data. In
The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia
, Nicholas Evans (ed.), 425–462. Canberra:Pacific Linguistics.
Bresnan, Joan.2001. The emergence of the unmarked pronoun. In
Optimality-theoretic Syntax
, Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw & Sten Vikner (eds), 113–142. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Choi, Hye-Won.1999. Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Furby, Edward, S. & Furby, Christine E.1977.
A Preliminary Analysis of Garawa Phrases and Clauses
. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
1983. Introduction. In
Topic Continuity in Discourse
[Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jakobson, Roman1984. Structure of the Russian verb. In
Roman Jakobson: Russian and Slavic Grammar Studies 1931–1981
, Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle (eds), 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jelinek, Eloise.1984. Empty categories, case and configurationality.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
2: 39–76.
Keen, Sandra.1983. Yukulta. In
Handbook of Australian Languages
, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry Blake (eds), 191–304. Canberra: ANU press.
Nordlinger, Rachel.1998a.
A Grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia)
. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Mushin, Ilana.2006. Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia.
Linguistic Typology
10: 267–326.
2008. Diverging paths: Variation in Garrwa tense/aspect clitic placement. In
Discourse and Grammar in Australian Languages
[Studies in Language Companion Series 104], Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds), 87–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mushin, Ilana & Simpson, Jane.2008. Free to bound to free? Interactions between pragmatics and syntax in the development of Australian pronominal systems.
Language
84(3):566–596.
Pensalfini, Rob.2004. Towards a typology of nonconfigurationality.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
22(2): 359–408.
Silverstein, Michael.1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In
Grammatical Categories in Australian languages
, Robert M.W Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Simpson, Jane & Mushin, Ilana.2008. Clause-initial position in four Australian Languages. In
Discourse and Grammar in Australian Languages
[Studies in Language Companion Series 104], Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds), 25–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
Coupe, Alexander R.
Dahl, Östen
Esseesy, Mohssen
Haig, Geoffrey
Haspelmath, Martin
Heine, Bernd
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
Klamer, Marian
McWhorter, John H.
Mithun, Marianne
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
Mushin, Ilana
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
Smith, Hiram L.
Zariquiey, Roberto
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
