In:Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar
Edited by Brian Nolan and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 145] 2013
► pp. 23–40
Transitivity, constructions, and the projection of argument structure in RRG
Published online: 6 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.145.02wat
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.145.02wat
Traditional “projectionist” accounts of transitivity project the argument structure of a clause from the head verb. Some studies within Construction Grammar have shown this does not account for cases in which syntactic frames override a verb’s inherent transitivity, arguing instead that transitivity is determined by the syntactic construction. Such examples typically come from English and related languages in which many or most verbs freely occur in transitive or intransitive frames without any overt derivational morphology. However, in languages such as Tepehua (Totonacan), verbs have rigidly specified transitivity, with no such overriding of argument structure. Role and Reference Grammar treats argument structure as a projection from the composite logical structure, accounting for clause structure in both types of languages.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Watters, James K.
2017. Spanish influence in two Tepehua languages. In Language Contact and Change in Mesoamerica and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 185], ► pp. 29 ff.
Watters, James K.
2017. Verb-verb compounds and argument structure in Tepehua. In Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events [Studies in Language Companion Series, 180], ► pp. 277 ff.
Watters, James K.
2017.
Tlachichilco Tepehua. In
Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 165 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
