In:Responses to Language Endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan
Edited by Elena Mihas, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval and Kathleen Wheatley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 142] 2013
► pp. 59–78
Training as empowering social action
An ethical response to language endangerment
Published online: 28 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.142.04gen
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.142.04gen
A recent response to language endangerment has been the rise of training programs in language documentation and conservation. Here we consider the position of training activities within the sociology of language documentation and conservation (LDC) work, specifically focusing on paradigms of ethical research and the relationship between academic and community partners. We examine one training program in depth, InField 2008, which had two distinct components: a set of short workshops, and intensive field training that incorporated language research. Grounding the discussion in the social science literature, we argue that training constitutes empowering social action and that different types of training promote different dimensions of empowerment. Training programs can be organized into a typology that is independent from, but overlaps with, the typology of research paradigms.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Fitzgerald, Colleen M.
2020. Language documentation and revitalization as a feedback loop. In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
