In:Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers
Edited by Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal and Michela Cennamo
[Studies in Language Companion Series 131] 2013
► pp. 477–510
Existential constructions
A semasiological perspective
Published online: 25 June 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.18gae
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.18gae
Existential constructions are normally defined as sentences in which some entity is associated with some location giving rise to the so-called locative paradigm which also involves the locative and the possessive construction (cf. Freeze 2001). In spite of the apparent simplicity of this approach, the assumption of an allegedly universal locative paradigm leaves unaccounted a broad variety of languages in which existential constructions cannot be straightforwardly related to the locative onomasiological format. In these languages, existential constructions arise as a consequence of complex grammaticalization changes, which start from different source constructions. In this paper, a semasiological perspective is adopted, which aims at sketching a brief typology of the possible source constructions giving rise to existential constructions.Einen Gott, den es gibt, gibt es nicht.‘There is no God which exists’.(Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Widerstand und Ergebung)
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Eva-Marie Bloom Ström, Hannah Gibson, Rozenn Guérois & Lutz Marten
Fuß, Eric & Benjamin L. Sluckin
Bernander, Rasmus, Maud Devos & Hannah Gibson
Gaeta, Livio
2023. Pure existentials vs. pure presentationals. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 102 ff.
Izre'el, Shlomo
McNally, Louise
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
