In:Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers
Edited by Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal and Michela Cennamo
[Studies in Language Companion Series 131] 2013
► pp. 405–434
Auxiliary selection in German
Constructional gradience with perfect formation
Published online: 25 June 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.15die
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.15die
The phenomenon of variance in auxiliary selection with haben and sein for perfect formation is very well known from a number of languages, and it is widely discussed. Recent models assume that sets of ranked criteria act as the semantic basis for auxiliary selection. Sorace’s hierarchical model (Sorace 2000), for example, is set to predict tendencies in auxiliary selection across languages. My approach will introduce three semantic criteria for perfect auxiliary selection in German. The criteria lead to a new version of Sorace’s model. It will be shown that findings concerning the diachronic development of haben and sein perfect support the general idea of gradience in the emergence of constructions. Keywords: German; auxiliary selection; auxiliary selection hierarchy; gradience; perfect; unaccusativity
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Gaeta, Livio
2017. Valency alternations between inflection and derivation. In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 237], ► pp. 328 ff.
Diederichsen, Elke
2015. Degrees of causivity in German lassen causitive constructions. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167], ► pp. 53 ff.
Diedrichsen, Elke
2014. A Role and Reference Grammar parser
for German. In Language Processing and Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series, 150], ► pp. 105 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
