In:Grammaticalization: Current views and issues
Edited by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 119] 2010
► pp. 51–72
Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization in English
Published online: 16 September 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.119.05tro
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.119.05tro
Traditional work on grammaticalization has often focussed on the creation of new atomic linguistic forms; recent research has suggested that grammaticalization may be considered as constructional emergence at an increasingly schematic level. Such a claim relies on an understanding of a construction as both (a) a form-meaning pairing in which the meaning of the whole is not derivable from the parts and (b) a string whose meaning is predictable from its parts, but which occurs with sufficient frequency for it to be stored as a pattern. The article summarises relevant issues in Construction Grammar, outlines aspects of existing research on constructions and grammaticalization in English and discusses some aspects of case loss and grammaticalization in the history of English including the loss of genitive objects. It also examines the place of analogy in grammaticalization. The article therefore presents new approaches to grammaticalization from the perspective of Construction Grammar.
Cited by (47)
Cited by 47 other publications
Elliott, John, Jens Van Gysel & Raina Heaton
Hekmat, Ali Mohammad, Soma Hotak, Deewa Karwar, Mohammad Kazim Amiri & Khatira Habibi
Stumpf, Sören
BYBEE, JOAN
WILSON, DAMIÁN VERGARA
Herbst, Thomas & Judith Huber
Enghels, Renata & Marie Comer
2020. Causative and inchoative constructions with poner and
meter (‘to put’) in Spanish. In Changes in meaning and function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 21 ff.
Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro
Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro
Margerie, Hélène
Mauri, Caterina, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini
Tian, Zhen
2019. On the partial productivity of constructions. In Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese [Human Cognitive Processing, 67], ► pp. 73 ff.
Wasserscheidt, Philipp
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copulashìconstruction. Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Perek, Florent
Taverniers, Miriam
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
Culicover, Peter W.
LAHOUSSE, KAREN & BÉATRICE LAMIROY
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.
Fried, Mirjam
2015. Irregular morphology in regular syntactic patterns. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 139 ff.
Patard, Adeline
Smirnova, Elena
2015. Constructionalization and constructional change. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 81 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 51 ff.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014. On the origin of clausal parenthetical constructions. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 189 ff.
Peng, Rui
Broccias, Cristiano
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
