In:The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana L. Chelliah
[Studies in Language Companion Series 108] 2009
► pp. 93–120
How useful is case morphology? The loss of the Old French two-case system within a theory of Preferred Argument structure
Published online: 11 March 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.108.07det
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.108.07det
This paper discusses the loss of the Old French two-case system within the theory of Preferred Argument Structure (Du Bois 2003, 1987). It will be shown that the chronology of this process followed a hierarchy of relative frequency, which in turn was driven by discourse preferences. Apart from strictly historical facts, this explanation also accounts for some basic typological properties of case-marking systems. In particular, it will be argued that no correlation exists between morphological case marking on the one hand and word-order flexibility on the other. Moreover, the theory of Preferred Argument Structure allows for a coherent assessment of the long-standing observation that in many cases, morphological case on full nouns is not necessary for distinguishing subjects from non-subjects.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Nijs, Julie, Freek Van de Velde & Hubert Cuyckens
Fedzechkina, Maryia, Elissa L. Newport & T. Florian Jaeger
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
