In:Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface
Edited by Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
[Studies in Language Companion Series 105] 2008
► pp. 263–284
The interplay of focus structure and syntax
Evidence from two sister languages
Published online: 21 November 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.20ben
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.20ben
I examine Italian and Sicilian main-clause word order drawing upon Van Valin (1993, 1999, 2005) and Van Valin & LaPolla (1997). Van Valin’s (1999) hypothesis on the typology of the interplay of focus structure and syntax is corroborated by micro-parametric variation. Although Italian is subject to a syntactic constraint and a pragmatic constraint on the canonical position of the subject, it proves to be rigid pragmatically and relatively flexible syntactically. Contrastingly, Sicilian turns out to be flexible in both ways. As a result of its pragmatic flexibility, Sicilian does not exhibit a topicalization strategy which is found in Italian and involves the association of a syntactic position with a specific pragmatic role. The analysis of the space which is outside the core of the clause indicates that the positions which define the potential focus domain of a language need not be adjacent.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Balogh, Kata
Cennamo, Michela, Francesco Maria Ciconte & Luigi Andriani
2023. Syntactic and semantic constraints on differential object marking in Old
Sardinian. In Differential Object Marking in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 280], ► pp. 105 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
