In:Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface
Edited by Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
[Studies in Language Companion Series 105] 2008
► pp. 161–178
RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar
Robert D. Van Valin Jr. | Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Published online: 21 November 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.14van
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.14van
Many syntactic theories assume a universal set of lexical categories, and they further assume these lexical categories are the basis of endocentric phrasal projections in the syntax. Role and Reference Grammar [RRG] makes neither of these assumptions, and in this paper an RRG account of lexical categories is developed, and it is argued that only noun and verb can be considered to be truly universal. Furthermore, the non-endocentric syntactic categories of RRG are expanded to include referring expressions, thereby solving problems that have plagued lexical-category-based, endocentric analyses. Finally, the issue of gradience in lexical categories is addressed, and it is argued that category labels like “noun” and “verb” are descriptive labels for words that share a large number of morpholexical and morphosyntactic properties, not theoretical concepts.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
McLellan, Alina
Bentley, Delia & Kiyoko Toratani
Martín-Padrón, Federico José
Moezzipour, Farhad & Seyyed Ali Ostovar-Namaghi
Izre'el, Shlomo
Latrouite, Anja
Butler, Christopher S.
2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Kim, Min-Joo
Roberts, John R.
Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco José
Bentley, Delia, Francesco Maria Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
