Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 9:3 (1985) ► pp.395–407
Book review
. Auxiliaries and Related Puzzels I and II. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983.
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1985
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.9.3.06ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.9.3.06ste
References (19)
Ajdukiewicz, K. 1967. “Syntactic Connexion”, in Polish Logic 1920–39, S. McCall, éd., Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Akmajian, A., S. Steele, and T. Wasow. 1979. ‘The Category AUX in Universal Grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry 101.1–64.
Akmajian, A. and T. Wasow. 1975. “The Constituent of VP and AUX and the Position of the Verb BE”, Linguistic Analysis 11.205–245.
Gazdar, G., G. Pullum, and I. Sag. 1982. “Auxiliaries and Related Phenomenan in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar”, Language 581.591–638.
Hale, K. 1981. “On the position of Warlpiri in a Typology of the Base”, Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Kaisse, E. 1981. “Luiseño Particles and the Universal Behavior of Clitics”, Linguistic Inquiry 121.424–434.
Lambek, J. 1961. “On the Calculus of Syntactic Types”, in R. Jakobson, éd., Structure of Languages and its Mathematical Aspects, (Symposium in Applied Mathematics XII1), Providence, American Mathematical Society.
Martin-Callejo, E. 1984. Some Aspects of Basque Morphology and Syntax, Tucson, University of Arizona doctoral dissertation.
Pullum, G. 1981. “Evidence against the “AUX” Node in Luiseño and English”, Linguistic Inquiry 121.435–464.
Pullum, G. and D. Wilson. 1977. “Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of Auxiliaries”, Language 531.741–788.
Ross, J. 1967. “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs”, in Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, W. Todd, ed., Evanston, Great Expectations Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
