Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 8:3 (1984) ► pp.415–438

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Joe Larochette. Le langage et la réalité II: L'emploi des formes de Vindicatif en français. München: Wilhelm Fink, 1980. 322 pp.

Reviewed by
 | Belgian National Science, Foundation (N.F.W.O.)
Published online: 1 January 1984
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.8.3.06swi
References (55)
References
Bach, Emmon. 1964. An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt – Rinehart – Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Syntactic Theory. New York: Holt – Rinehart – Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl. 1957. Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, William. 1960. Time, Tense, and the Verb. A study in theoretical and applied linguistics, with particular attention to Spanish. Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press (1968 3 ).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1970a. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970b. A Semantically Based Sketch of Onondaga ( IJAL, Memoir 251). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (reprint 1975).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques – Edouard Pichon. 1911–1940. Des mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: d’Artrey (71 volumes).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donzé, Roland. 1967. La Grammaire générale et raisonnée de Port-Royal. Contribution à l’histoire des idées grammaticales en France. Bern: Francke (1971 2 ).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducháček, Otto. 1966. “Sur le probleme de l’aspect et du caractere de l’action verbale en francais”. Le français moderne 341. 161–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1929. Temps et verbe. Théorie des aspects, des modes, et des temps. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1945. L’architectonique du temps dans les langues classiques. Copenhagen: Munksgaard (Reprinted together with Guillaume 1929: Paris: Champion, 1965).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heger, Klaus. 1963. Die Bezeichnung temporal-deiktischer Begriffskategorien im französischen und spanischen Konjugationssystem. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. “Problémes de l’analyse onomasiologique du temps verbal (“aspects” et “ordres de procés”)”. Linguistica Antverpiensia 21. 229–250.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Monem, Wort, Satz und Text. Zweite erweiterte Auflage. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer (1971 1 ). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1977. “Towards a Theory of Tense”. Linguistic Inquiry 81. 521–558.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. “The Study of Meaning in Natural Language: Three Approaches to Tense”. Hornstein, Norbert – David Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics. The logical problem of language acquisition, 116–151. London – New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imbs, Paul. 1960. L’emploi des temps verbaux en français moderne. Essai de grammaire descriptive. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klum, Arne. 1961. Verbe et adverbe. Etude sur le système verbal indicatif et sur le système de certains adverbes de temps à la lumière des relations verbo-adverbiales dans la prose du français contemporain. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larochette, Joe. 1945. “L’imparfait et le passé simple”. Les Etudes classiques 131. 55–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1958. Grammaire des dialectes Mangbetu et Medje suivie d’un manuel de conversation et d’un lexique. Tervuren: Koninklijk Museum van Belgisch-Congo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967a. “A propos de la fonction et de l’origine possible des classes nominales dans les langues africaines”. Journal of African Languages 61. 224–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967b. “La signification”. Linguistica Antverpiensia 11. 127–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. “A propos du livre de Klaus Heger Monem, Wort und Satz ”. Linguistica Antverpiensia 61. 155–179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. “La representation de la réalité”. Folia linguistica 61. 177–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Le langage et la réalité I: Problèmes de linguistique générale et de linguistique romane. Munchen: W. Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. “A propos de la méthode onomasiologique appliquée par Klaus Heger”. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 41. 47–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. “La déixis temporelle en francais”. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 51. 65–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linacre, Thomas. 1524. De emendata structura latini sermonis libri sex. (Menston: Scolar Press, 1968).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Robert. 1971. Temps et aspect. Essai sur l’emploi des temps narratifs en moyen français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naert, Pierre. 1960. “Mode de présentation, aspect, mode d’action, détermination et transitivite”. Studia Linguistica 141. 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1975. “Classical Antiquity: Greece”. Th. A. Sebeok (gen. ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 131: Historiography of Linguistics, 69–126. The Hague – Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max. 1939. “Die Begründung der abendländischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa”. Nachrichten von der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil. -Hist. Klasse, Neue Folge 31. 151–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollak, Wolfgang. 1960. Studien zum “Verbalaspekt” im Französischen. Wien: R. Rohrer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. “Aspekt und Aktionsart”. Linguistik und Didaktik 1:1. 40–47; 1:2. 155–163.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[Priscian]. Prisciani grammatici caesariensis institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII. H. Keil ed., Grammatici Latini, volumes II & III1. Hildesheim: G. Olms (reprint of the 1855 edition of Priscian’s grammar by M. Hertz).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus. 1562. Gramère. Paris: A. Wechel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1967. Introduction à la grammaire générative. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1969. “Zur Problematik des Verbalaspekts”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 261. 119–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus. Adversus mathematicos. With an English translation by R. G. Bury (The Loeb Classical Library; volumes 2, 3 and 41 of Sextus Empiricus’s translated works). London: W. Heinemann; Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1936–1949).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stéfanini, Jean. 1954. “La tradition grammaticale francaise et les temps surcomposés”. Annales de la Faculté des Lettres d’Aix 281. 67–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sten, Holger. 1952. Les temps du verbe fini (indicatif) en français moderne. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1984a. “Une étape dans la “chronogénesé” du guillaumisme: L’Architectonique du temps dans les langues classiques ”. Modèles linguistiques (to appear).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984b. “La Grammaire de Port-Royal et le parallélisme logico-grammatical”. Orbis (to appear).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varro, Marcus Terentius. De lingua latina. (On the Latin Language. With an English translation by R. G. Kent [The Loeb Classical Library], London: W. Heinemann; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 21 volumes, 1938).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendryes, Joseph. 1968. Le langage. Introduction linguistique à l’histoire. Paris: Albin Michel (First edition: 1923).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Hans J. et al. 1973. Transformationele taalkunde. Utrecht – Antwerpen: Spectrum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vet, Co. 1980. Temps, aspects et adverbes de temps en français contemporain. Essai de sémantique formelle. Genéve: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald. 1964. Tempus. Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer (1971 2 ).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Le temps. Le récit et le commentaire. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilmet, Marc. 1972. Gustave Guillaume et son école linguistique. Paris: Nathan; Bruxelles: Labor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Etudes de morpho-syntaxe verbale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yvon, Henri. 1953–1954. “Etude de notre vocabulaire grammatical. Nomenclature des ‘tiroirs’ de l’indicatif”. Le français moderne 21:4. 247–262; 22:1. 11–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margarita Suñer. Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence-Types. Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press, 1982. xi + 371 pages. $12.95 (paperback).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Loux-Schuringa, J. A. Le
1988. Tenses in 19th-century Dutch sentence-grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 15:1-2 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Swiggers, Pierre
1986. Semiotics in the Low Countries. In The Semiotic Sphere, ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue