Grammatical Relations in Ergative Languages

Van Valin Jr., Robert D.

doi:10.1075/sl.5.3.05van

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 5:3 (1981) ► pp.361–394

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Grammatical Relations in Ergative Languages

Robert D. Van Valin Jr. | Australian National University

Published online: 1 January 1981

https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.3.05van

Two of the most important issues in the discussion of ergativity concern the pattern of syntactic organization and notion of subject in ergative languages. A number of scholars have claimed that most morphologically ergative languages are in fact syntactically accusative. Data from four ergative languages (Archi, Enga, Jacaltec and Dyirbal) are examined with regard to these two questions. It is found that each of these languages differs from the others both in syntactic organization and notion of subject, and these facts call into question recent claims about the syntax of ergative languages.

Cited by (31)

Cited by 31 other publications

Order by:

Fabrizio, Claudia

2025. Alignment and Subjecthood in Latin,

Sun, Xiaoxue & Yicheng Wu

2022. (Non-)compositionality and complexity: A crosslinguistic investigation. Lingua 275 ► pp. 103344 ff.

Rahman, Ghani, Abdul Hamid, Laraib Rahat, Arshad Ali Khan & Abid Karam

2021. VERBAL CLITICS IN ROLE AND REFERENCE GRAMMAR. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:2 ► pp. 581 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror

2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff.

Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena

2019. Argument selectors. In Argument Selectors [Typological Studies in Language, 123], ► pp. 1 ff.

Malchukov, Andrej

2018. Forty years in the search of a/the subject. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 241 ff.

Morbiato, Anna

2018. How Subjective Is the Subject? A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Mandarin Chinese . Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale :1

Pradeep Kumar Das

2016. REVERSED COMPOUND VERBS IN HINDI: AN INQUIRY OF ITS FORM AND FUNCTION. Journal of South Asian Studies 22:1 ► pp. 153 ff.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & Ricardo Mairal-Usón

2014. Interfacing the lexicon and an ontology in a linking system. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 205 ff.

Butler, Christopher S.

2012. Syntactic functions in Functional Discourse Grammar and Role and Reference Grammar: an evaluative comparison. Language Sciences 34:4 ► pp. 480 ff.

Creissels, Denis

2008. Direct and indirect explanations of typopological regularities: The case of alignment variations. Folia Linguistica 42:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.

Creissels, Denis

2009. Uncommon patterns of core term marking and case terminology. Lingua 119:3 ► pp. 445 ff.

Creissels, Denis

2024. Transitivity, Valency, and Voice,

Legate, Julie Anne

2008. Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

URA, HIROYUKI

2006. A Parametric Syntax of Aspectually Conditioned Split-Ergativity. In ERGATIVITY [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 65], ► pp. 111 ff.

Van Valin, R.D.

2006. Functional Relations. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 683 ff.

Donohue, Mark

2005. Configurationality in the Languages of New Guinea* * I wish to acknowledge the contributions of many conversations with Bill Foley and Jane Simpson about matters discussed in the following article, made possible by the research environment provided by the University of Sydney. Further, two patient AJL reviewers have improved the clarity of this article immensely, a host of patient grammar-writers have both unknowingly and knowingly supplied data, and several classes of sometimes patient students in several continents who have seen these ideas tried out and refined, and our Lani friends in Australia and Papua, especially Indep Wanimbo deserve thanks for their patience. The usual disclaimers apply.. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

Valin, Jr., Robert D. van

2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,

Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.

2022. Role and reference grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 1171 ff.

Haig, Geoffrey

1998. On the interaction of morphological and syntactic ergativity: Lessons from Kurdish. Lingua 105:3-4 ► pp. 149 ff.

Roberts, Linda

1995. Pivots, voice and macroroles: From Germanic to universal grammar. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 157 ff.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D.

1995. Role and reference grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 461 ff.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D.

2009. Role and reference grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Bańczerowski, Jerzy

1993. Some theoretical aspects of diathesis. In Sprache - Kommunikation - Informatik, ► pp. 17 ff.

Cumming, Susanna & Fay Wouk

1987. Is there ‘discourse ergativity’ in Austronesian languages?. Lingua 71:1-4 ► pp. 271 ff.

Larsen, Thomas W.

1987. The syntactic status of ergativity in Quiché. Lingua 71:1-4 ► pp. 33 ff.

Jones, Linda K.

1986. The question of Ergativity in Yawa, a Papuan language∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Van der Auwera, Johan

1985. Talmy Givón, Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984. Pp. xx + 464.. Journal of Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 503 ff.

van Valin, Robert D.

1983. Pragmatics, ergativity and grammatical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Van Valin, Robert D.

1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:1 ► pp. 145 ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ► pp. 768 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.