Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 40:2 (2016) ► pp.457467

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (27)
References
Andersen, Henning (ed.). 2001. Actualization: Linguistic change in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald R. & Rochelle Lieber. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 291. 801–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2012. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 61. 209–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 881: 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Radical construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 881. 601–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2009. APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 21–41. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert. 2008. The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora 31. 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2008. Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The semantics of pragmatic expressions. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics ( Handbook of pragmatics , vol.41.), 587–311. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Richard Waltereit. 2006. GCI theory and language change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 381. 235–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013a. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 458–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 241. 385–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 2007. Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques, Cristina Grisot & Bruno Cartoni. 2012. Jusqu’où les temps verbaux sont-ils procéduraux? Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 301. 119–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 2011. Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 370–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization, 45–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de. 2011. On some methodological issues in the conceptual/procedural distinction. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives, 55–79. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit. 2010. Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke & Theresa Biberauer. 2014. From macroparameters to nanoparameters: a comparative Bantu case study. Paper presented at ComSyn meetings , Leiden, 5 February 2014.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue