Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 40:2 (2016) ► pp.340–379

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The ‘imperfective’ in attributive clauses in Korean as a window into the evidential past and the metaphysical future

 | Texas Tech University
Published online: 1 July 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.2.03kim
This article discusses the temporal interpretation of two attributive clause markers in Korean -te-un and -nu-un, which are standardly analyzed as carrying past imperfective and present imperfective meanings, respectively. I show that -te-un and -nu-un carry not only temporal but also modal/evidential meanings and they do so in ways hitherto unnoticed. I claim that -te-un presents an eventuality from a retrospective point of view, providing a window into what I call ‘an evidential past’, whereas -nu-un does so from a projective point of view, providing a window into what I call ‘a metaphysical future’. The findings of this paper suggest that the line between Tense, Aspect, Mood, and Evidentiality can be blurrier in some languages than in others, and that when interpreting attributive clauses, what is construed as the viewpoint holder and in which direction the viewpoint is headed relative to some temporal anchor may matter greatly.
References (49)
Aikhenvald, Alexandria Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, Hyung-Bae. 1983. Wuli malbon [Our grammar]. 10th edn. Seoul: Chungumsa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2005. Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and speech act in Korean. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University dissertation. (Revised version published in 2012 by John Benjamins.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics 151. 187–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Korean evidentials and assertion. Lingua 1201. 932–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In David Beaver, Luis Casillas Martínez, Brady Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.), The construction of meaning, 59–81. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2002. The semantics of the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Austin, TX: The University of Texas dissertation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 181. 83–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huh, Wung. 1987. Kwuke ttaymaykimpepuy pyenchengsa [The history of tense systems in Korean]. Seoul: Saem Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jhang, Sea-eun. 1994. Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jo, Mi-Jeung. 2003. The correlation between syntactic nominalization and the internally headed relative constructions in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar 131. 535–564.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1985. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 141–170. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo. 2004. Event structure in the internally-headed relative clause constructions in Korean and Japanese. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Temporal marking in Korean attributive clauses and linguistic encoding of human memory. Journal of Cognitive Science 141. 77–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ko, Youngkeun. 2007. Hankwukeuy sice sepep tongcaksang [The aspect of the tense usage of Korean]. 2nd edn. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory VIII1, 92–110. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Lee, Chungmin. 1987. Temporal expressions in Korean. In Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective, 435–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011/2012. Evidentials and modals: What makes them unique. International Journal of Language Data Processing (SDV) 35/361. 71–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hanjung. 2006. Parallel optimization in case systems: Evidence from case ellipsis in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 151. 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jungmee. 2011. The Korean evidential -te: A modal analysis. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 8: Papers from CSSP 91, 287–311. [URL]. (Accessed 5 Jan 2016).
. 2013. Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality. Natural Language Semantics 211. 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Kee-Dong. 1993. A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Dongsik. 2010. Evidentials and interrogatives: A case study from Korean. Los Angeles, CA: The University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1992. A reference grammar of Korean. Tokyo: The Charles E. Tuttle Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Hotze Rullmann & Henry Davis. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’ámt’imcets. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), The linguistic variation yearbook, vol. 71, 201–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2011. On apparently non-modal evidential. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8: Papers from CSSP 91, 333–357. [URL]. (Accessed 5 Jan 2016).
Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1995. Double-access sentences and reference to states. Natural Language Semantics 31. 177–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Double-access sentences generalized. In Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory IX1, 224–236. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 741. 760–787. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1975. Retrospection in Korean. Language Research 111. 87–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. The Korean language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae-Mog. 2002. A typological analysis of the Korean evidential marker ‘-te’. Eoneohag [Linguistics] 321. 147–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suh, Jeong-Su. 1977. -Te-nun hoysanguy kinungul kacinunka? Congkyelpepkwa inyongpepuy -te-lul cungsimulo [Does -te- have a retrospective function? Focusing on the sentence-final and quotative functions of -te-]. Ene [Language] 21. 97–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Kwuke mwunpep [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Kyenghee University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Rich. 1970. Indeterminate time and truth-value gaps. Theoria 361. 264–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulving, Endel. 1972. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (eds.), Organization of memory, 381–403. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology 531. 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human. In H. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness, 3–56. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kim, Min-Joo
2019. Capturing the Korean Facts. In The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Modifiers and the Theory of Universal Grammar [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 96], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue