Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 4:2 (1980) ► pp.293308

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (21)
References
Comrie, B. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In: M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions. 261–312, Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. 1979. Ergativity. Language 551:59–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In: E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. 1–88, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977. The case for case reopened. In: P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations. 59–81, Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, W. & R. Van Valin. 1977. On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. BLS 31:293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (ed.). 1979. Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1970. Passive and ergative in language change. In: S. Wurm & D. Laycock (eds.), Pacific Linguistics studies in honor of Arthur Capell. 757–783, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helbig, G. & W. Schenkel. Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
Lang, R. 1973. Grammatical sketch. In: A. Lang, Enga dictionary. Pacific Linguistics series C, no. 20, xviii–lvii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. & R. Lang. 1978. Enga and other Papuan languages: the syntactic irrelevance of morphological ergativity. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, D. 1972. Toward a semantic specification of deep case. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1973. The instrumental case in English. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. & P. Postal. 1977. Toward a universal characterization of passivization. BLS 31:394–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, P. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actortopic, or none of the above?. In: C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. 491–518, Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977. Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In: P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations. 279–306, Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: R. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. 112–171, Humanities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, R., P. Schachter & B. Partee. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. 1965. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Librarie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. 1977. Ergativity and the universality of subjects. CLS 131: 689–705.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. To appear in Lingua.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. & W. Foley. 1979. Role and reference grammar. To appear in: E. Moravcsik (ed.), Syntax and semantics 13: Current approaches to syntax. Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue