Cover not available

Article published In: The Why and How of Total Reduplication: Current Issues and New Perspectives
Edited by Daniela Rossi
[Studies in Language 39:4] 2015
► pp. 789–794

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The why and how of total reduplication

Current issues and new perspectives

Published online: 3 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.001in
References (16)
Botha, Rudolph P. 1988. Form and meaning in word formation: A study of Afrikaans reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. Morphophonology: The dynamics of derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3). 515–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2005. Less is more: Evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 533–547. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The meanings of ‘more of the same’: Iconicity in reduplication and the evidence for substrate transfer in the genesis of Caribbean Creole languages”. In Silvia Kouwenberg (ed.), Twice as meaningful: Reduplication in pidgins, creoles and other contact languages, 7–18. Westminster: Battlebridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maas, Utz. 2005. Syntactic reduplication in Arabic. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 395–429. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In J.H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Volume 3: Word structure, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1862. Doppelung (Reduplikation, Gemination) als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache, beleuchtet aus Sprachen aller Welttheile. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky. 2014. Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Franz Rainer, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.). Morphology and meaning, 3–46. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl. 2005. Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 11–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1970. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2011. Total reduplication: The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Bremen: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2007. Re: duplication. Iconic vs counter-iconic principles (and their areal correlates). In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas: Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective, 317–350. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie. 1973. The phonology of reduplication. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue