Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.46–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Evidentiality in interaction

A pragmatic analysis of Korean hearsay evidential markers

Published online: 15 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.1.03ahn
This paper examines how hearsay evidential markers in Korean are used within the pragmatic domain to serve a wide range of epistemic and politeness functions. In particular, we focus on a new paradigm of hearsay evidential markers — more specifically, the V-ta ha-X > V-ta-X type, among them -tako, -tamye, -tamyense, -tanun, and -tanta (see Ahn & Yap 2014) — and using data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken Corpus, we examine the extended uses of these hearsay evidential markers in natural conversations, and show how these ‘say’-derived evidential markers contribute to the expression of different shades of speaker stance. Special attention is also given to their distinctive roles in modulating the strength — as well as pragmatic nuance — of an epistemic claim. This study also examines the role of main-clause ellipsis, in particular its contribution to the reanalysis of the (quoted) complement clause as a stand-alone ‘new main clause’, and the concomitant reinterpretation of the erstwhile ha ‘say’ complement-taking matrix clause as a sentence final particle that often retains an evidential reading but also captures the pragmatic nuance of its discourse context. The findings of this study contribute to a fuller understanding of how ‘say’-derived evidential constructions in Korean (and potentially also in other languages) extend their semantic scope to develop into markers of speakers’ subjective and intersubjective/interpersonal stance.
References (105)
Ahn, J. 2006. A studying of connecting ending, ‘-myenseo’ in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 451. 179–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R.M.W. Dixon. 1998. Evidentials and areal typology: A case study from Amazonia. Language Sciences 201. 241–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y. & R.M.W. Dixon. 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y. & R.J. LaPolla. 2007. New perspectives on evidentials: A view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. 1988. The acquisition of aspect and modality. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ball, J.D. 1888. Cantonese made easy: A book on simple sentences in the Canton Dialect, 2nd edn. Hong Kong: China Mail Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2007. Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, I. Nikolaeva (ed.), 115–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 256–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. & J. Nichols (eds.), 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, M. 1998. The discourse functions of Taiwanese kong in relation to its grammaticalization. In S-F., Huang (ed.), Selected papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 111–127. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y.R. 1947 [1969]. Cantonese primer. New York: Greenwood Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, H. 2008. Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 121. 45–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, K., 1994. Grammaticalization of the saying verb wa in Cantonese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 51: 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, K. 2007. Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics 15(3).187–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Korean evidentials and assertion. Lingua 1201. 932–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 65–72.
. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In F.H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta & J. Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3).529–564.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, R. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everett, D. 2008. Wari’ intentional state constructions. In R.D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface, 381–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, M. 2003. Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua. In J. Anderssen, P. Menéndez-Benito & A. Werle (eds.), Proceedings of SULA 2, Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 19–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B.A. 2001. Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2). 167–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gipper, S. 2011. Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, L.R. 1981. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology vol. 21, 141–165. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & J.W. Astington. 1988. Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false-belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development 591. 26–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, K. 2011. Innovation in nominalization in Magar: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In F.H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta & J. Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 215–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, W. & D. Shi. 2012. Syntactic position and function of ‘hika’ in Shanghainese, paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of Chinese Linguistic Society, August 2012. Yunnan: Yunnan University.
. 2013. The grammaticalization of modal particles in Shanghainese. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of Cognitive Linguistics, University of Alberta, June 23-28.
Hengeveld, K. & M. Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. Forthcoming. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. [URL]
Higashiizumi, Y. 2006. From a subordinate clause to an independent clause. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, J. & J. Irvine. 1993. Introduction. In Jane Hill & Judith Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 1–23. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horie, K. 2012. The convergence of stance-related functions of nominalization in Modern Japanese. Paper presented at the Workshop on Stance and Discourse: Discourse Perspectives, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, May 7-9.
Hsieh, F. 2012. On the grammaticalization of the Kavalan SAY verb zin . Oceanic Linguistics 51(2). 467–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. 1993. The structure of intonation unit in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jang, G.H. 2012. A study on the meaning of the final endings oriented from the connective endings-focus on the discourse-semantical functions of ‘-go’ and ‘-neunde’. Korean Semantics 381: 109–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, J. 2013. A study of syntactic structures and discourse functions of –ko(yo) functioning as final endings. Discourse and Cognition 20(1). 183–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, L. & B. Utas (eds.). 2000. Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighboring languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, A. 1990. Zyoohoo no nawabari riron: Gengo no kinooteki bunseki [ The theory of territory of information: A functional analysis of language ]. University of Tsukuba dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (1). 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997b. Evidentiality and some discourse characteristics in Japanese. In A. Kamio (ed.), Directions in Functional Linguistics, 145–171. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M.J. 2011. Grammaticalization in Korean: The evolution of the existential verb. London: Saffron Books (in conjunction with the Centre for Korean Studies, SOAS).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M.S. 2005. Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation. Discourse Studies 7(1). 87–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Evidential strategies in Korean conversation: An analysis of interactional and conversational narrative functions. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker –tamye . Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, N. 2001. Reportative evidential in Korean. Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics 101. 105–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konoshima, M. 1973. Kokugo Joshi no Kenkyuu [A study of particle in Japanese]. Tokyo: Oofuusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, I. 2012. Please confirm what I inferred: On the Korean evidential marker -napo-. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 958–969. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPolla, R.J. 2000. Review of A grammar of Meithei (Mouton Grammar Library 17), by Shobhana L. Chelliah. Lingua 110(4). 299–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. 2010. The Korean evidential –te: a modal analysis. In O. Bonami & P.C. Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, 287–311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. 2011. An analysis of the declarative ending -tanta on its derivational process and its semantic function. The Study of Korean Language and Literature 391. 209–239.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, W-M. 2006. On the synchrony and diachrony of sentence-final particles: The Case of wo in Cantonese. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong dissertation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, W. 2009. A study of the Cantonese hearsay particle wo from a tonal perspective. International Journal of Linguistics 1(1). E1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, D. 2010. Evidentials and Interrogatives: A Case Study from Korean. University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, D. and C. Lee. 2012. Perspective shifts in Korean evidentials and the effect of contexts. Proceedings of SALT 221: 26–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loughnane, R. 2005. Reported speech constructions in Golin. In N. Evans, J. Besold, H. Stoakes & A. Lee (eds.), Materials on Golin: Grammar, texts and dictionary, 131–152. Melbourne: Department of Linguistics and Applied Lingustics, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, S. 1998. Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5 . In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics , 325–334
McGregor, W.B. 1994. The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 63–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miura, A. 1974. ‘To’ to ‘tte’ [ To and tte ]. Nihonggo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education] 241. 23–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrison, R. 1828 [2001]. Vocabulary of the Canton Dialect. London: Ganesha Publishing Limited. [First ed. published in Macao: East India Company’s Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nam, M. 2010. The formation and meaning of an ending “-dago” and its kind. Hanmalyenku [Studies on Korean Language] 261. 109–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. 2010. Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12). 1176–1189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, J. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohori, T. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In M. Shibatani and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 201‐218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, N. 2004. A Suggestion for the Description of the Sentence Ending Forms in Korean Grammar for Foreign Learners -focusing on the pragmatic meanings of “-eo”, “-ne”, “-chi”, “-da”, “-kuna”, “-danda.”. Bilingualism 261. 91–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park N. 2013. A study on descriptions of contraction form ‘-dani’ in KFL grammar. Bilingual Research 511: 45–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhee, S. 2012. Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3). 284–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudolph, D. 1993. Getting past politeness: The role of linguistic markers of evidentiality and informational domains in Japanese student-teacher interactions at the graduate level. University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saegusa, R. 1997. Tte no taikei (Syntax of tte). Gengo Bunka [Language and Culture] 341: 21–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saxena, A. 1988. On syntactic convergence: the case of the verb ‘say’ in Tibeto-Burman. In Berkeley Linguistics Society: proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting, February 13–15, 1988. Berkeley, Calif, edited by Shelley Axmaker et al. 375–388.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shinzato, R. 2015. Two types of conditionals and two grammaticalization pathways. In Sylvie Hancil (ed.), Sentence Final Particles. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter 157–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sohn, H.M. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sohn, S. 2011. Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 181. 126–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, J.M. 1998. Anmaycumssikkuth ‘-te-’uy uymi kinungey tayhaye: Yuhyengloncek kwancemeyse [On the semantic function of the pre-final ending -te-: From a typological perspective]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 321. 135–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Evidential marker -deo- in Korean: From a typological perspective. In Hee-Don Ahn & Namkil Kim (eds.), Selected papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 457–470. Seoul: Gyungjin Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, L.I. 2004. Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30(1). 19‒40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, T.J. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (63-641). 945–1001.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki. S. 1998. Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 291. 429–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. 1999. Marker of unexpected statements: An analysis of the quotative particle datte . Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33(1). 44–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamaji, M. & F.H. Yap. 2013a. Where does pragmatic marker tte come from? — Convergence of to ifute, to itte and tote constructions in the diachronic development of ‘say’ constructions in Japanese. Paper presented at the 15th Annual International Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences (JSLS 2013), Nagasaki, June 28-30.
. 2013b. On the emergence of finite structures from non-finite constructions: Evidence from ‘say’ constructions n Japanese. Paper presented at the 10th Biennual Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT-9), University of Leipzig, August 15-18.
Trent, N. 1997. Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Voort, H. 2002. The quotative construction in Kwaza and its (de-)grammaticalisation. In M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort (eds.), Current Studies on South American Languages: Indigenous Languages of Latin America 31, 307–328.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y., A. Katz & Z. Chen. 2003. Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25(5). 457–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & J. Perner. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 131. 103–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, F.H. & M. Ahn. 2011. Evidentiality and counterexpectation marking strategies in Cantonese and Korean. Paper presented at the Workshop on Evidentiality and Mood, Seoul National University, October 19.
Yap, F.H., K. Grunow-Harsta & J. Wrona (eds.). 2011. Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. Typological Studies in Language 96. 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, F.H., Y. Yang & T.-S. Wong. 2014. On the development of sentence final particles (and utterance tags) in Chinese. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change (Studies in Pragmatics 12). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeung, K. 2006. On the status of the complementizer waa6 in Cantonese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(1). 1–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuzawa, K. 1954. Edokotoba no Kenkyuu [A Study of Language in the Edo Period]. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Tanangkingsing, Michael
2024. The marking of weak stance in Cebuano: The case of the versatile demonstrative kanάng. Journal of Pragmatics 230 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Xin & Yansheng Mao
2023. If I testify about others, my testimony is valid. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:4 ► pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua 274 ► pp. 103230 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2020. “That being so, but …”: An analysis of Korean kunyang as a marker of speaker's attenuated divergent stance. Journal of Pragmatics 160 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
González Vázquez, Mercedes
2022. Unhas notas sobre o sistema evidencial galego. Estudos de Lingüística Galega ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
González Vázquez, Mercedes
2025. Factores pragmáticos en el uso de los marcadores evidenciales en gallego. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 436 ff. DOI logo
González-Vázquez, Mercedes
2021. The evidentiality system in Galician and the seica marker. Journal of Pragmatics 178 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Kazuhiro Teruya, Mohamed Ali Bardi, Abhishek Kumar Kashyap & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2018. Quoting and reporting across languages: A system-based and text-based typology. <i>WORD</i> 64:2 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Chad Walker
2018. Sentence Final Particles (SFPs) and Audience Sensitivity in Korean Discourse: A Multimodal Discourse Approach. Language Facts and Perspectives 43:null ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Chor, Winnie
2018. Sentence final particles as epistemic modulators in Cantonese conversations: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Wai, Brian Lap-ming & Foong Ha Yap
2018. Inclusivity and exclusivity in the use of Cantonese ngo5dei6 (‘we’) in evasive replies in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Bernárdez, Enrique
2017. Evidentiality—A Cultural Interpretation. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung
2016. Emotion in interaction. Studies in Language 40:4 ► pp. 872 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Mary Shin
2015. Stancetaking in the face of incongruity in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue