Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.24–45

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A new type of convergence at the deictic center

Second person and cislocative in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman)

 | University of Oregon
Published online: 15 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.1.02kon
There is a functional overlap between motion towards the deictic center and (di-)transitive events directed at speech act participants. Grammatical evidence for this comes from verbal morphemes that are used in motional clauses like ‘come to me!’ and ditransitive clauses like ‘give (it) to me!’ While the literature suggests that such syncretic markers develop through extension from a cislocative (venitive/ventive) to a speech act participant index, the evidence presented here indicates that this development has gone the other way in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). This suggests that neither cislocative nor non-subject speech act participant indexation is more primary, but that they share an equally basic idea of orientation towards and therefore impact on the deictic center.
References (36)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001. On the syntax of agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Studies in Language 24(3). 583–610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boro, Krishna. 2012. Hierarchical verb agreement in Hakhun Tangsa. Paper presented at the Eighteenth Himalayan Languages Symposium, Benares Hindu University, India.
Burling, Robbins. 2004. The language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo), Vol. 11. Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981a. An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns. Language 57(3). 626–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981b. The Category of Direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1). 83–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. The Analysis-Synthesis-Lexis Cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change.” In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 367–89. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese.” In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson, (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon, 51–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Lectures on Functional Syntax. Presented at the LSA Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara. [URL].
. 2013. The history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 61. 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 1991. Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare, Athpare and Dungmali. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 73–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grüßner, Karl-Heinz. 1978. Arleng Alam, die Sprache der Mikir: Grammatik und Texte. Beiträge zur Südasienforschung 39. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2013. Reconstructing the category of ‘associated motion’ in Tacanan languages (Amazonian Bolivia and Peru). In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Osaka, 25-30 July 2011, 129–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order.” Linguistic Typology 171. 187–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kansakar, Tej R., Yogendra P. Yadava, Krishna Prasad Chalise, Balaram Prasain, Dubi Nanda Dhakal & Krishna Paudel. 2011. A Grammar of Baram. Linguistic and Ethnographic Documentatation of the Baram Language, Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koga, Hiroaki & Toshio Ohori. 2008. Reintroducing Inverse Constructions in Japanese: The Deictic Verb Kuru ‘to Come’ in the Paradigms of Argument Encoding. In Robert D. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface (Studies in Language Companion Series 105), 37–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda. 2014a. A Grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. Karbi and Pnar: A case study of the relationship between tibeto-burman and austroasiatic. Paper presented at the Inaugural Workshop of the International Consortium for Eastern Himalayan Ethnolinguistic Prehistory, Armidale, Australia.
Konnerth, Linda & Amos Teo. 2014. Acoustic-Statistical and Perceptual Investigations of Karbi Tones: A Peculiar Case of Incomplete Neutralisation of F0. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey & Priyankoo Sarmah (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 61, 13–37. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, N.J.C. 2009. Ventive, dative and allative in Old Babylonian. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 92(2). 200–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 2010. Hierarchical Person Marking in the Rawang Language. In Dai Zhaoming (ed.), Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, 107–13. Heilongjian University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. New directions in referentiality. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (Typological Studies in Language 33), 413–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2003. “Hakha Lai.” In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 409–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phinney, Archie. 1934. Nez Perce texts, Vol. 251 (Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharma, H. Surmangol & N. Gopendro Singh. 2008. Pronominal Markers in Purum and Manipuri. Paper presented at the 3rd annual meeting of the North East Indian Linguistics Society, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2003. Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (Typological Studies in Language), 259–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch, 251–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, Shirley. 1966. The Shasta language. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 201. 111–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, Theodore. 1984. Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8(1). 43–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2003. Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Driem, George. 1991. Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54 (3). 520–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Koval, Sergey & Sergey Loesov
2025. The ventive and the deictic shift. Studies in Language 49:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode & Michael Bulkaam
2024. Iconicity as the motivation for the signification and locality of deictic grammatical tones in Tal. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Akter, Mohammed Zahid
2024. Argument indexation on verbs in Pangkhua and South Central Tibeto-Burman (Kuki‑Chin). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 47:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume & José Andrés Alonso de la Fuente
2022. Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Genetti, Carol, Kristine Hildebrandt, Nathaniel A. Sims & Alexia Z. Fawcett
2021. Direction and associated motion in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistic Typology 25:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Konnerth, Linda & Andrea Sansò
2021. Towards a diachronic typology of individual person markers. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Guillaume, Antoine
2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue