Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 38:4 (2014) ► pp.9951004

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (23)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E. 1993. Against split morphology. Yearbook of morphology 1993, ed. by Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle. 27–49. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley. 2012. Network morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius. 2011. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. The morphology and phonology of exponence: the state of the art, ed. by Jochen Trommer. 427–495. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1999. Origins of complex language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Umlaut as signans and signatum: Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Yearbook of Morphology 1999, ed. by Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle. 1–23. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Affixes, stems and allomorphic conditioning in paradigm function morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 2004, ed. by Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle. 253–81. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The evolution of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa. 2004. Language, mind and brain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. The Oxford handbook on linguistic interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss. 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fradin, Bernard & Françoise Kerleroux. 2003. Troubles with lexemes. In Topics in Morphology. Selected papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, ed. by Geert E. Booij, Janet de Cesaris, Sergio Scalise & Angela Ralli. 177–196. Barcelona: IULA-Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, volume 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2011a. Allomorphy, autonomous morphology and phonological conditioning in the history of the Daco-Romance present and subjunctive. Transactions of the Philological Society, 109(1): 59–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Morphomes and “stress-conditioned allomorphy” in Romansh Maiden et al. (eds), 36–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds). 2011. Morphological autonomy: perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, Marianne Brodahl. 2012. Sterke verb og semantiske fellestrekk. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo. [URL]
Nübling, Damaris. 2008. Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 75(3): 282–330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, John Charles. 2011. Variable analyses of a verbal inflection in (mainly) Canadian French. Maiden et al. (eds), 311–327.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spilling, Eivor F., Marianne B. Nilsen & Hans-Olav Enger. 2014. Reorganising grammatical variation in Norwegian. In prep.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Greg T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. Maiden et al. (eds), 358–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Non-finite forms, periphrases and autonomous morphology in Latin and Romance. Maiden et al. (eds), 417–435.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue