Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 38:4 (2014) ► pp.792–835

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Intersubjective evidentials in Yurakaré

Evidence from conversational data and a first step toward a comparative perspective

 | University of Cologne
Published online: 8 December 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.4.05gip
This paper argues that evidentials in Yurakaré (Bolivia, isolate) have an intersubjective dimension in that they do not only express the speaker’s information source, but also convey the speaker’s assumptions about the addressee’s perspective on the information. To describe these intersubjective evidentials, an analysis is proposed in terms of a relation between speaker and addressee and two propositions, the expressed proposition and the proposition which constitutes evidence for it. Evidence from conversational data is presented to support the intersubjective analysis of the Yurakaré evidentials. Comparing Yurakaré to two other languages, South Conchucos Quechua (Hintz 2007) and Southeastern Tepehuan (Willett 1991), it is suggested that there are at least two types of intersubjective evidentials. Evidentials of the first type have different forms contrasting in terms of intersubjectivity within evidential types (South Conchucos Quechua, Southeastern Tepehuan), while those of the second type have specific intersubjective components without such a contrast (Yurakaré).
References (37)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(3). 255–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik. 2012. Epistemic marking in Ika (Arwako). Studies in Language 36(1). 154–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Epistemic perspective in grammar: Theoretical and practical issues. Presentation at the Endangered Languages Week 2013 at SOAS, London, 23 May 2013, [URL] (20 March 2014).
Curnow, Timothy J. 2002. Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3). 611–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2005. View with a view: towards a typology of multiple perspective. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31(1). 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gijn, Rik van. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gijn, Rik van, Vincent Hirtzel & Sonja Gipper. 2011. The Yurakaré Archive. Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. [URL] (1 April 2014).
Gipper, Sonja. 2011. Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. From inferential to mirative: An interaction-based account of an emerging semantic extension. In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 83–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers, finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 71. 95–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1986. Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 113–136. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. 2006. La evidencialidad y la co-construcción del conocimiento en el quechua del sur de Conchucos. Paper presented at the 52nd International Congress of Americanists, Seville, Spain, July 2006.
Hintz, Diane. 2007. Past tense forms and their functions in South Conchucos Quechua: Time, evidentiality, discourse structure, and affect. Santa Barbara: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirtzel, Vincent. 2010. Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1990 [1957]. Shifters and verbal categories. In Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston (eds.), On Language, 386–392. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2004. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2). 127–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In Caroline Fery & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur vox sapientia: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 287–319. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landaburu, Jon. 2007. La modalisation du savoir en langue andoke (Amazonie Colombienne). In Zlatka Guentchéva & Jon Landaburu (eds.), L’énonciation médiatisée II. Le traitement épistémologique de l’ínformation: Illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes, 23–47. Louvain & Paris: Éditions Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 1997. The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30(2). 93–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Denny. 2007. Endangered Languages of Lowland Tropical South America. In Mathias Brenzinger (ed.), Language diversity endangered, 29–58. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1). 111–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 71–93. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schenner, Mathias. 2010. Evidentials in complex sentences: Foundational issues and data from Turkish and German. In Tyler Peterson & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Evidence from evidentials, 183–220. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, vol. 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiver, Tanya. 2005. Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2). 131–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Federico Rossano. 2010. Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(1). 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a comparative overview of the category in Panoan. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 33-61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. A reference grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Arlington, TX: SIL & The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Pan, Yun
2025. Evidential Strategies in Chinese Social‐Mediated Communication: A Digital Conversation‐Analytic Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:4 ► pp. 1953 ff. DOI logo
Enfield, N. J.
2022. Enchrony. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:4 DOI logo
Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
2022. Egophoricity and evidentiality: Different categories, similar discourse functions. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
De Decker, Filip
2018. The Augment Use of Εειπε and Ειπε in Early Epic Greek: An Evidential Marker?. Symbolae Osloenses 92:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
De Decker, Filip
2021. A Contrastive Study of the Co-occurrence of the Augmented, Unaugmented and Iterative forms in -σκ- in Iliad 24. Historical Linguistics 134:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2018. From similarity to evidentiality. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2020. Beyond committing and presupposing in Yurakaré conversations: Investigating the interactional functions of epistemic markers through their sequential distributions. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2024. Request for confirmation sequences in Yurakaré. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo
Brugman, Claudia M. & Monica Macaulay
2015. Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue