Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 38:1 (2014) ► pp.5–43
Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages
An exercise in pragmatic typology
Published online: 25 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.1.01din
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.1.01din
In conversation, people have to deal with problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding. We report on a cross-linguistic investigation of the conversational structure of other-initiated repair (also known as collaborative repair, feedback, requests for clarification, or grounding sequences). We take stock of formats for initiating repair across languages (comparable to English huh?, who?, y’mean X?, etc.) and find that different languages make available a wide but remarkably similar range of linguistic resources for this function. We exploit the patterned variation as evidence for several underlying concerns addressed by repair initiation: characterising trouble, managing responsibility, and handling knowledge. The concerns do not always point in the same direction and thus provide participants in interaction with alternative principles for selecting one format over possible others. By comparing conversational structures across languages, this paper contributes to pragmatic typology: the typology of systems of language use and the principles that shape them.
References (85)
Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2(2). 193-216.
Beeching, Kate. 2002. Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, vol. 1041. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Benjamin, Trevor. 2012. When problems pass us by: Using ‘You Mean’ to help locate the source of trouble. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1). 82-109.
. 2013. Signaling trouble: On the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
Blythe, Joe. 2009. Doing referring in Murriny Patha conversation. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bolden, Galina B. 2009. Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs 76(2). 121-143.
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1978. Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. In Henry Hiz (ed.), Questions, 87-105. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Brown, Penelope. 1998. Conversational structure and language acquisition: The role of repetition in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(2). 197-221.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & C.R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 10-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Edward Schaefer. 1987. Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes 2(1). 19-41.
Curl, Traci S. 2005. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes 39(1). 1-43.
Cysouw, M. 2004. Interrogative words: An exercise in lexical typology. Presentation presented at the
Bantu grammar: Description and theory workshop
, February 13.
Cysouw, Michael. 2007. Content interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(2). 133-163.
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. An intonational grammar for Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32(1). 5-34.
Dingemanse, Mark & Simeon Floyd. In press. Conversation across cultures. In N.J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira & N.J. Enfield. 2013. Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLOS ONE.
Drew, Paul. 1997. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 281. 69-101.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2011. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Münich: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL].
Egbert, Maria. Forthcoming. Selection principles for other-initiated repair turn formats - an answer from positioned questions. In John Heritage, Gene H. Lerner & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Finding the universal in the particular: Festschrift for Emanuel A. Schegloff on his 70th birthday. Blackwell.
. 1996. Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte? Language in Society 25(4). 587-612.
. 2009. Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen Gesprächen. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. [URL].
Egbert, Maria, Andrea Golato & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2009. Repairing reference. In Jack Sidnell (ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, 104-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2013. Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N.J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, et al. 2013. Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 343-380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N.J., Tanya Stivers & Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 42(10). 2615–2619.
Fox, Barbara A., Hayashi, Makoto & Jasperson Robert. 1996. Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Elinor Ochs, Emanual A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, 2nd edn. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. Language structure and language function. In John Lyons (ed.), New horizons in linguistics, 140-165. London: Penguin.
Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.). 2013. Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John. 2012. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1). 30-52.
Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15-38.
Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context (GURT ’84), 11-42. Washington: Georgetown University Press. [URL].
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In David N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294-338. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press.
Kamio, Akio. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21(1). 67-100.
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Discourse and Cognition 61. 141-168.
Lerner, Gene H. 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37(2). 151-184.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Moerman, Michael. 1977. The preference for self-correction in a Tai conversational corpus. Language 53(4). 872–882.
Moerman, Michael & Harvey Sacks. 1988. On “Understanding” in the analysis of natural conversation. In Michael Moerman (ed.), Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis, 180-186. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ochs, Elinor. 1984. Clarification and culture. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), GURT’84: Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Ohala, John J. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41(1). 1-16.
Olivier, Cl. 1985. L’art et la manière : ‘comment’ dans les stratégies discursives. Langages 20(80). 71-98.
Purver, Matthew. 2004. The theory and use of clarification requests in dialogue. King’s College, University of London, August. [URL].
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs 731. 137-161.
. 2013. Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 261-292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. & Heidi Kevoe-Feldman. 2010. Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43(3). 232-259.
Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 15-21. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch & Neil J. Smelser (eds.), The micro-macro link, 207-234. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
. 1996. Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology 102(1). 161-216.
. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23(3). 499-545.
. 2006. Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N.J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, 70-96. Oxford: Berg.
. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2). 361-382.
Selting, Margret. 1987a. Verständigungsprobleme. Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel der Bürger-Verwaltungs-Kommunikation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1987b. Reparaturen und lokale Verstehensprobleme oder: zur Binnenstruktur von Reparatursequenzen. Linguistische Berichte 1081. 128-149.
. 1987c. Fremdkorrekturen als Manifestationsformen von Verständigungsproblemen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 6(1). 37-58.
. 1996. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair-initiation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 231-270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Repair. In Jef Verschueren & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007. Repairing person reference in a small Caribbean community. In N.J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, 281-308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2010b. Questioning repeats in the talk of four-year-old children. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis, 23-41. London: John Wiley.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 1996. On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 277-327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language & Social Interaction 38(2). 131-158.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.). 2011. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35(3). 367-392.
Suzuki, Kana. 2010. Other-initiated repair in Japanese: Accomplishing mutual understanding in conversation. Kobe: Kobe University dissertation.
Svennevig, Jan. 2008. Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics 40(2). 333-348.
Cited by (70)
Cited by 70 other publications
Albert, Saul, William Housley, Rein Ove Sikveland & Elizabeth Stokoe
König, Katharina, Martin Pfeiffer & Kathrin Weber
Safar, Josefina & Lauren Reed
Thongphut, Aonrumpa & Jagdish Kaur
2025. Multiple repair solutions in response to open class repair initiators (OCRIs) in next turn. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
Chen, Yuqiu & Mailin Antomo
Cuskley, Christine, Rebecca Woods & Molly Flaherty
Deppermann, Arnulf, Ibrahim Cindark, Lari Kotilainen, Salla Kurhila & Inkeri Lehtimaja
Gubina, Alexandra, Barbara A. Fox & Chase Wesley Raymond
2024. What to do next. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 20 ff.
Sidnell, Jack & Hương Thị Thanh Vũ
De Stefani, Elwys
2023. Displaying a negative stance by questioning meaning. Interactional Linguistics 3:1-2 ► pp. 40 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf
Deppermann, Arnulf & Elwys De Stefani
Dippold, Doris
Henkin, Roni
2023. Intergenerational interviews in Negev Arabic. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:4 ► pp. 532 ff.
Jokipohja, Anna-Kaisa
Schnell, Stefan, Geoffrey Haig, Nils Norman Schiborr & Maria Vollmer
2023. Are referent introductions sensitive to forward planning in discourse?. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 231 ff.
Skedsmo, Kristian
Tůma, František, Jana Obrovská & Petr Svojanovský
Jokipohja, Anna-Kaisa & Niina Lilja
Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
2022. Egophoricity and evidentiality: Different categories, similar discourse functions. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Schnell, Stefan & Nils Norman Schiborr
Zinken, Jörg & Uwe-A. Küttner
周, 星源
周, 星源
Gafaranga, Joseph
Haselow, Alexander
2021. Dealing with trouble in conversation in English-speaking cultures. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 42:3 ► pp. 324 ff.
Mostovaia, Irina
Chen, Jessie & Scott Barnes
Følstad, Asbjørn & Cameron Taylor
Girard-Groeber, Simone
Kurhila, Salla & Lari Kotilainen
Rasenberg, Marlou, Asli Özyürek & Mark Dingemanse
Rossi, Giovanni
Ameka, Felix K. & Marina Terkourafi
Barnes, Scott & Steven Bloch
Barnes, Scott & Steven Bloch
Barnes, Scott, Sophie Toocaram, Lyndsey Nickels, Suzanne Beeke, Wendy Best & Steven Bloch
Brookes, Heather & Olivier Le Guen
Jentzsch, Sophie F., Sviatlana Höhn & Nico Hochgeschwender
Kamunen, Antti
Koivisto, Aino
Laakso, Minna, Inkeri Salmenlinna, Tarja Aaltonen, Inka Koskela & Johanna Ruusuvuori
Blythe, Joe, Rod Gardner, Ilana Mushin & Lesley Stirling
Byun, Kang‐Suk, Connie de Vos, Anastasia Bradford, Ulrike Zeshan & Stephen C. Levinson
Margutti, Piera, Liisa Tainio, Paul Drew & Véronique Traverso
Oloff, Florence
Routarinne, Sara & Liisa Tainio
Egbert, Maria
2017. Selection principles of other-initiated repair turn formats. In Enabling human conduct [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 273], ► pp. 167 ff.
Lee, Heeju, Danjie Su & Hongyin Tao
2017. A crosslinguistic study of some extended uses ofwhat-based interrogative expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 8:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Lindström, Jan K., Catrin Norrby, Camilla Wide & Jenny Nilsson
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra Thompson
2017. Negative scope, temporality, fixedness, and right- and left-branching. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 543 ff.
Opfermann, C. & K. Pitsch
Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Luke, Kang Kwong & Hiroko Tanaka
Mihas, Elena
Tanaka, Hiroko
de Vos, Connie, Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson
Dehé, Nicole
Dingemanse, Mark
2015. Folk definitions in linguistic fieldwork. In Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa [Culture and Language Use, 17], ► pp. 215 ff.
Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, N. J. Enfield & Sonja Kotz
Levinson, Stephen C.
Lilja, Niina
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, N. J. Enfield & Johan J. Bolhuis
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
