Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 37:4 (2013) ► pp.693–735
Differential subject marking without ergativity
The case of colloquial Burmese
Published online: 20 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.4.01jen
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.4.01jen
While differential object marking seems to be widespread and is well represented in the linguistic literature, differential subject marking appears to be much less common. Burmese is one example of a language that marks some, but not all subjects, depending on a number of pragmatic factors. This phenomenon is widespread in Tibeto-Burman languages, but Burmese apparently differs from these in not having an underlying ergative alignment or an agentive source of the subject marker, suggesting that there are other sources for DSM than the ones identified in the literature. This study looks at the functions of the marker ká with subjects in colloquial Burmese and discusses factors favoring its occurrence and possible paths of its development.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Hu, Suhua
2021. The split word orders APV and PAV of Nuosu Yi. Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Chappell, Hilary & Jean‐Christophe Verstraete
Jenny, Mathias
2019. Grammatical relations in Mon. In Argument Selectors [Typological Studies in Language, 123], ► pp. 107 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2018. Focus marking and differential argument marking. In Information structure in lesser-described languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 195 ff.
Donlay, Chris
2017. The role of disambiguation in pragmatic agentivity. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. Animacy and differential subject marking in the Ikema dialect of Miyako. Studies in Language 39:3 ► pp. 754 ff.
Ozerov, Pavel
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
