Thomas Stolz, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. On comitatives and related categories: A typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 33]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. andAnnette Endruschat. Durch ‘mit’ eingeleitete präpositionale Objekte in den romanischen Sprachen [Diversitas Linguarum, 13]. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 2007.

Reviewed by

Heiko Narrog | Tohoku University

Published online: 17 May 2011

https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.4.09nar

References (6)

References

Arkhipov, Alexandre. 2009. Comitative as a cross-linguistically valid category. New challenges in typology. Transcending borders and refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps, & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds.), 223–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lehmann, Christian & Yong-Min Shin. 2005. The functional domain of concomitance. A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. Typological studies in participation (Studia Typologica 71), Christian Lehmann (ed.) 9–104. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Seiler, Hansjakob. 1974. The principle of concomitance: instrumental, comitative and collective (with special reference to German). Foundations of Language 12/2: 215–247.

Seiler, Hansjakob and Waldfried Premper (eds.) 1991. Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten. Tübingen: Günther Narr Verlag.

Stolz, Thomas. 1997. Some instruments are really good companions – some are not. On syncretism and the typology of instrumentals and comitatives. Theoretical Linguistics 23 (1/2): 113–200.

Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Uhlik, M. & A. Žele

2019. Slovenian comitative constructions with dual personal pronouns. Rhema :3, 2019 ► pp. 115 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.