Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 34:2 (2010) ► pp.487491

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (5)
References
Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath, & Andrej Malchukov. 2010 (to appear). Ditransitive questionnaire. Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, Andrej Malchukov; Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2008. Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. The typology of semantic alignment, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), 121–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson, & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 81: 149–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2019. The Sign Theory of Language and the form-meaning interface / La Théorie du langage basée sur le signe et l’interface forme-sens. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:02  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue