Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 34:2 (2010) ► pp.382–416
Creativity in the use of gender agreement in Mawng
How the discourse functions of a gender system can approach those of a classifier system
Published online: 13 August 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.06sin
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.06sin
The two main types of nominal classification systems in Australian languages — classifiers and genders — are usually easy to distinguish both formally and functionally. However, in the Australian language Mawng, gender agreement carries much of the burden of reference, varies depending on how an entity is construed, and contributes elements of compositional meaning to discourse, with properties usually associated with classifiers rather than genders. The way that semantically-based genders are used in Mawng suggests that we need to add how classification is used to our typologies of nominal classification systems; existing typologies consider mainly morphosyntactic and semantic properties.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Mailhammer, Robert & Mark Harvey
CORBETT, GREVILLE G. & SEBASTIAN FEDDEN
Guzmán-González, Trinidad
2015. Assigned gender in a corpus of nineteenth-century correspondence among settlers in the American Great Plains. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4], ► pp. 199 ff.
Kilarski, Marcin
2014. The Place of Classifiers in the History of Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 41:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
