Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 33:3 (2009) ► pp.612–643
The grammatical versatility of taboo terms
Published online: 23 July 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.3.04nap
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.3.04nap
Taboo terms in certain English expressions and constructions are intensifiers, which have spread as a unit over time to various syntactic positions (Hoeksema & Napoli 2008). Here we look at the pragmatic coherence that has allowed such semantically disparate terms to be grammaticalized as a unit. We examine language using taboo terms in English with comparisons to Dutch, Italian, and other languages. The terms studied here regard religion, disease, sex, and bodily excretions. They exhibit common characteristics with cross-linguistic variation.
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Aryasuari, Putu Tanniya Pradnyan, I Gede Budasi & Putu Adi Krisna Juniarta
Graci, Roberto
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
Olimat, Sameer Naser, Dana Khalid Mahadin, Bassil Mashaqba & Amer Al-Adwan
Chwalczuk, Monika
Carson, Lorna & Ning Jiang
Carson, Lorna & Ning Jiang
Hoey, Elliott M., Paul Hömke, Emma Löfgren, Tayo Neumann, William L. Schuerman & Kobin H. Kendrick
Loos, Cornelia, Jens-Michael Cramer & Donna Jo Napoli
Pinto, Clara
Hoeksema, Jack & Donna Jo Napoli
Margerie, Hélène
Suleymanova, Venera & Jack Hoeksema
Di Cristofaro, Matteo & Tony McEnery
2017. Chapter 8. Swearing in Italian. In Advances in Swearing Research [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 282], ► pp. 183 ff.
Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman
2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 55 ff.
Horn, Laurence R.
Seongha Rhee
Valdeón, Roberto A.
Vardi, Ruti
Antieau, Lamont D.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
