Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 32:1 (2008) ► pp.137–162
The syntax of intonation units in Sasak
Published online: 15 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.1.06wou
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.1.06wou
In this paper I examine the syntactic nature of intonation units in Sasak, and compare the distribution of syntactic types with previously published work on other languages, in particular Mandarin, and to a lesser extent, Japanese. Sasak and Mandarin prove to have very similar frequencies of clausal IUs, but Sasak has far more complete clauses than Mandarin, which prefers elliptical clauses. Nominal IUs in the Sasak data are far more likely to be independent than in Japanese or Mandarin conversational data, and fulfill very different functions than those found in studies of Mandarin. I argue that cross-linguistic differences in the relative frequencies of different types of syntactic constituents are best explained partly in terms of the syntactic resources available in a given language, and partly in terms of cultural variation in conversational practice. Differences in the relative frequencies of various functions of nominal IUs, however, may relate more to genre than to language, but the limited corpora used in studies to date make this difficult to determine.
Keywords: syntax, genre, intonation units, constituency, Sasak, conversation
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Kibrik, Andrej A.
Khairunnisa
2021. Variation in Ampenan Sasak pronominal forms. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 7:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
Izre’el, Shlomo
2020. The basic unit of spoken language and the interfaces between prosody, discourse and
syntax. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 77 ff.
Kibrik, Andrej A., Nikolay A. Korotaev & Vera I. Podlesskaya
2020. Russian spoken discourse. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 35 ff.
Tao, Hongyin
2020. NP clustering in Mandarin conversational interaction. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 271 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
