Article published In: Perspectives on Grammar Writing
Edited by Thomas E. Payne and David J. Weber
[Studies in Language 30:2] 2006
► pp. 385–415
A typology of good grammars
Published online: 31 March 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.2.10ric
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.2.10ric
Writing a grammar is an exhilarating and exhausting experience. All grammars must meet high expectations. This paper reports on a study of qualities sought in grammars based on a survey of reviews of grammars. The study reveals that linguists expect a grammar to be comprehensive, clear, and accessible to all. It should also contain careful argumentation and a wealth of data that is appropriate, authentic, and meticulously checked. Writers of grammars must ask themselves a variety of questions before they begin, including what the goal of the grammar is, who the audience for the grammar is, how much time there is to write the grammar, and what the language reveals about its grammar. The paper then discusses and evaluates specific examples of good grammars of various types.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2025. Grammar in action. In Grammar in Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 37], ► pp. 1 ff.
Grimm, Nadine
Hammarström, Harald
Machin, Elita
Seidel, Frank
2015. Describing endangered languages. In Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa [Culture and Language Use, 17], ► pp. 277 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
