Article published In: Perspectives on Grammar Writing
Edited by Thomas E. Payne and David J. Weber
[Studies in Language 30:2] 2006
► pp. 259–279
Collective field work
Advantages or disadvantages?
Published online: 31 March 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.2.05kib
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.2.05kib
For forty years, linguistic fieldwork on the minority languages of Soviet and post-Soviet States has been conducted by members of the Philological Faculty of Moscow State University. The present paper describes the “Moscow approach” to team-based fieldwork, including the history, problems, advantages and disadvantages of this unique venture. The conclusion is that the advantages of collective fieldwork outweigh the disadvantages, but that there are several requirements that must be in place in order for the method to be effective. These include a clear organizational scheme, several available language consultants, and supportive attitudes on the parts of all participants. In recent years, a combination of researcher specialization and cross-training in multiple sub-disciplines has become an increasingly important component of the collective field trips.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Seidel, Frank
2015. Describing endangered languages. In Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa [Culture and Language Use, 17], ► pp. 277 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
