Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 29:3 (2005) ► pp.583–615
Can the lexicalization/grammaticalization distinction be reconciled?
Published online: 16 November 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.3.03lig
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.3.03lig
Recent work on the relationship between lexicalization and grammaticalization appears to yield a consensus compatible with traditional notions of gestalt linguistics. A survey of the literature indicates the complexity of this supposed dichotomy, and provides a starting point from which we may evaluate a diagrammatic approach to the problem. Examples focus on the German derivational suffix -heit, cognate with English -hood. Such suffixation has traditionally been difficult for scholars to assess in terms of lexicality and grammaticality. Taking the gestalt concepts of parts and wholes into account, the inherent flexibility and fluidity between lexicalization and grammaticalization becomes apparent.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Lightfoot, Douglas
Operstein, Natalie
ten Wolde, Elnora
2018. Premodification in evaluative of-binominal noun phrases. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 169 ff.
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2014. Diachrony and the polysemy of derivational affixes. In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 127 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2014. Review of Diewald, Kahlas-Tarkka & Wischer (2013): Comparative studies in early Germanic languages: With a focus on verbal categories. Diachronica 31:4 ► pp. 564 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Philippe Hiligsmann
Schoonjans, Steven
Bischoff, Shannon T.
Pierce, Marc
Trousdale, Graeme
Prévost, Sophie & Benjamin Fagard
Choï-Jonin, Injoo
Prevost, Sophie
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.