Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 29:1 (2005) ► pp.149–167

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.). The Verb in Turkish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. . [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 44].

Reviewed by
Published online: 11 March 2005
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.1.08zid
References (26)
References
Aissen, J. 1974. Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 51: 325–366.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1985. The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 161: 373–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), 1–52, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional heads: A cross-linguistics perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: the structure of the clause. 2nd ed., K. Hengeveld (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enç, M. 1986. Topic switching and pronominal subject in Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, Dan I. Slobin and Karl Zimmer (eds.), 195–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erguvanlı, E. 1986. Pronominal versus zero representation of anaphora in Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, Dan I. Slobin and Karl Zimmer (eds.), 206–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (ed). 2001. The Verb in Turkish. Linguistik Aktuell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, L. 1994. Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora. In Tense systems in European languages, R. Thieroff and J. Ballweg (eds.), 247–266. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. 1977. A note on subject raising in Turkish. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 736–742.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. On copular clitic forms in Turkish. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 61, A. Alexiadou, et al. (eds.), 96–114. Berlin: ZASGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Postpositions and adverbs: a case study in syntactic categories. In The Balance of Truth: Essays in Honor of Professor Geoffrey Lewis, Ç. Balım and C. Imber (eds.), 217–237. Istanbul: The Isis Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. 1962. A compact analysis for the Turkish personal morphemes. In American Studies in Altaic Linguistics, N. Poppe (ed.), 141–176. Bloomington: Idiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1972. The Turkish copula. In The verb ‘Be’ and its synonymes. J. W. M. Verhaar (ed.). 64–73. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. and P. Postal. 1984. The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In Studies in Relational Grammar 21. Perlmutter, D. and C. Rosen (eds.), 81–125. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapoport, T. R. 1999. Structure, aspect and the predicate. Language 741: 653–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raposo, E. 1987. Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 181: 85–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yavaş, F. 1980. On the meaning of Tense and Aspect markers in Turkish. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kansas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zidani-Eroğlu, L. 1997. Exceptionally case marked DPs as matrix objects. Linguistic Inquiry 281: 219–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue