‘Internal’ versus ‘external’ universals: Commentary on Eckman

White, Lydia

doi:10.1075/sl.28.3.19whi

Article published In: What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics?: The case of innateness
Edited by Martina Penke and Anette Rosenbach
[Studies in Language 28:3] 2004
► pp. 704–706

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

‘Internal’ versus ‘external’ universals

Commentary on Eckman

Lydia White | McGill University

Published online: 14 September 2004

https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.3.19whi

Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rothman, Jason

2008. Why All Counter‐Evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis in Second Language Acquisition Is not Equal or Problematic. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:6 ► pp. 1063 ff.

Shirai, Yasuhiro & Hiromi Ozeki

2007. INTRODUCTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29:2 ► pp. 155 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.