Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 28:1 (2004) ► pp.225–237
Book review
. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. xviii + 238 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 5 May 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.1.12boo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.1.12boo
References (34)
Baayen, Harald; Burani, Christina; and Schreuder, Robert. 1997. “Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal and singular plurals in Italian”. In: Booij, Geert; and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996, 13–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bauer, Laurie. 1993. Review of Becker 1990. In: Booij, Geert; and van Marle, Jaap (eds), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 264–68. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Baumann, Monica. 1996. The production of syllables in connected speech, Ph.D. diss., University of Nijmegen.
Booij, Geert. 1997. “Non-derivational phonology meets Lexical Phonology”. In Roca, Iggy (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 261–288. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
. 1999. “The role of the prosodic word in phonotactic generalizations”. In: Hall and Kleinhenz (eds.), 47–72.
. In press. “Lexical storage and phonological change”. To appear in Hanson, Kristin; and Inkelas, Sharon (eds.) The nature of words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Burzio, Luigi. 2000. “Cycles, non-derived environment blocking, and correspondence”. In: Dekkers, Joost; van der Leeuw, Frank; and van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), Optimality theory. Phonology, syntax and acquisition, 47–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 1988 “Morphology as lexical organization”. In: Hammond, Michael; and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches to modern linguistics, 119–142. San Diego: Academic Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1993. “Morphology without word-internal constituents: A review of Stephen R. Anderson’s A-morphous morphology”. In: Booij, Geert; and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 209–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Clahsen, Harald. 1999. “Lexical entries and rules of language. A multidisciplinary study of German inflection”. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 221: 991–1013.
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2000. Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch. Ph.D. diss, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Ernestus, Mirjam; and Baayen, Harald. 2001. “Choosing between the Dutch past tense suffxes -te and -de
”. In: van der Wouden, Ton; and Broekhuis, Hans (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001, 77–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hall, Tracy Alan; and Kleinhenz, Ursula. 1999 (eds.). Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. “Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative?” Linguistics 391: 1041–1070.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1975. “Semantic and morphological regularities in the lexicon”. Language 511: 639–671.
Jong, Nivja de; Schreuder, Robert; and Baayen, Harald. 2000. “The morphological size effect and morphology”. Language and Cognitive Processes 151: 329–365.
Krott, Andrea. 2001. Analogy in morphology. The selection of linking elements in Dutch compounds. Ph. D. diss., Univ. of Nijmegen.
1992. “Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations”. Cognition 421: 1–22.
Nooteboom, Sieb; Weerman, Fred; and Wijnen, Frank. (eds.) 2002. Storage and computation in the language faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hinskens, Frans, Ben Hermans & Marc van Oostendorp
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
