Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 26:3 (2002) ► pp.691–706

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller & Arnim von Stechow. Wh-Scope Marking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 37].

Reviewed by
 | Oklahoma State University
Published online: 1 November 2002
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.3.10vel
References (17)
References
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. “Quantified Structures as Barriers to LF Movement.” Natural Language Semantics 41:1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the Typology of wh-questions. Ph.D. diss., Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 151. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1994. “Scope Marking as Indirect wh-Dependency.” Natural Language Semantics 21:137–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Anoop Mahajan. 1996. “Partial Movement and Successive Cyclicity.” In Lutz & Müller (eds.), 131–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia. 2001. “ Wh-Expletives and Secondary Predication.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13.1:5–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 1995. “Partial wh-Movement and wh ‘Scope Markers’.” In: István Kenesei (ed.), Levels and Structures, 69–124. Szeged: JATE. (Approaches to Hungarian 51.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Status of wh-Expletives and the Partial wh-Movement Construction of Hungarian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 151:509–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “On the Syntax of ‘wh-Scope-Marker’ Constructions: Some Comparative Evidence.” Ms. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, Uli & Gereon Müller (eds.). 1996. Papers on wh-Scope Marking. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 3401, Bericht Nr. 76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana. 1989. “Partial and Multiple Wh-Movement.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71:565–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1996. “Partial wh-Movement and Optimality Theory.” In: Lutz & Müller (eds.), 179–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen. 1997. Skopus und logische Struktur. Studien zum Quantorenskopus im Deutschen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1996. “On was-Parentheticals and Was … was Constructions in German.” In: Lutz & Müller (eds.), 257–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Norbert W. 1997. What Moves Where When in Which Language. Ph.D. diss., MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim v. & Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue