Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 26:2 (2002) ► pp.476486

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (29)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1995. “Morphological Case: No Need for Functional Projections in German.” In: Language and Cognition 51, Roel Jonkers, Edith Kaan and Anko Wiegel (eds.), 1–12. Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The base Structure of the German Clause under Discourse Functional Weight: Contentful Functional Categories vs. Derivative Ones.” In: German: Syntactic Problems  – Problematic Syntax, Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen (eds.), 11–43. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Molnárfi László. 2002. “The German Clause under discourse functional weight: Focus and Antifocus.” In: Issues in Comparative German(ic) Typology ed. by W. Abraham & J. -W. Zwart. 1–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam, T. Holloway & G. Ramchand (eds.) 1993. Theoretical Perspectives on Word Order in South Asian Languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In: The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvian Bromberger, Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), 1–52. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. “A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 24(2), 239–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut. 1988. “Kasusmorphologie und Kasusrelationen: Überlegungen zur Kasustheorie am Beispieldes Deutschen.“ Linguistische Berichte 1181, 275–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, František (ed.) 1974. Papers on functional sentence perspective. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1964. On defining Theme in functionalsentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11, 267–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 1993. Deutsche Syntax- generativ. Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Form Follows Function Fails  – as a Direct Explanation for Properties of Grammars. In: The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy. Paul Weingartner & Gerhard Schurz & Georg Dorn (eds.), 92–108. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Inger Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling. Sprache und Pragmatik 491, 1–104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hajičová, Eva & Barbara Partee and Petr Sgall (eds.) 1998. Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures and semantic content. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1997. “Optional Scrambling and Predication.” Texas Linguistic Forum 381, 135–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Optional Scrambling and Interpretation.” In: Interface Strategies, Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert & Eric Reuland (eds.), 153–168. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horváth, Júlia. 1995. “Structural Focus, Structural Case and the Notion of Feature-Assignment.” In: Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin Éva Kiss (ed.), 28–64. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop. 1991. “Clitic Doubling, Object Agreement and Specificity.” Proceedings of NELS 211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathesius, Villem. 1939. “On the so-called functional sentence perspective.” Slovo a Slovesnost 51, 171–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molnárfi, László 1999. „Zur Diskurskomponente in der Sprechsprache: vir als Rhemamarkierer im Afrikaans.” In: Werner Abraham (ed.) Characteristic Issues in Spoken Vernaculars, Specialissue of Folia Linguistica 33(1), 75–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Focus and Antifocus in modern Afrikaans and West Germanic.” To appear in Linguistics 40/6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1996. “Optional Movement and the Interaction of Economy Constraints.” In: Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin, Gärtner & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, 115–145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Tanya Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling and the PF Interface.” In: Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Gueder (eds.) The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI-publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosengren, Inger. 1994. „Scrambling- was ist das?“ In: B. Haftka (ed.) Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, 175–195. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue