Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 25:2 (2001) ► pp.347–353

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen. The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series, 53]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. xi + 417 pp.

Reviewed by
 | Nijmegen, Netherlands
Published online: 7 December 2001
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.09foo
References (16)
References
Abraham, W. (ed.). 1991. Discourse particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Discourse Processes 24:1. 1997. Special issue on Discourse Markers from a cognitive point of view. W. Spooren & R. Risselada (eds.). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Journal of Pragmatics 30:2. 1998. Special issue on Discourse Markers and coherence relations. R. Risselada & W. Spooren (eds.). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foolen, A. 1996. “Pragmatic particles.” In: J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. 24 pp. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. 1996. “Pragmatic markers.” Pragmatics 61, 167–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. “What are discourse markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 311, 931–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, M. Mosegaard. 1996. “Some common discourse particles in spoken French.” In: M. Mosegaard Hansen & G. Skytte (eds.), Le discours: Cohérence et Connexion. Actes du colloque international, Copenhague le 7 avril 1995, 105–149. (= Etudes Romanes, 351). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998a. “The semantic status of discourse markers.” Lingua 1041: 235–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harder, P. 1996. Functional semantics. A theory of meaning, structure and tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon, C. 1995. Discourse particles in Latin. A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, F. 1991. “Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization.” Language 671: 475–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, L. 1999. “Discourse markers.” Lingua 1071, 227–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue