Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp.462469

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (9)
References
Bybee, Joan L. 1995. “Regular morphology and the lexicon”. Language and Cognitive Processes 101. 425–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. “The emergent lexicon”. Chicago Linguistic Society 341.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan; William Pagliuca; and Revere Perkins. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, John N. 1987. “The evolution of Romance auxiliaries: criteria and chronology”. In Harris, Martin and Paolo Ramat (eds), Historical development of auxiliaries, 257–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. “Emergent grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quesada, J. Diego. 1995. “ Estar + -ndo y el aspecto progresivo en español”. Iberoromania 421. 8–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 1998. Verbal periphrases in Romance: aspect, actionality, and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue