Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 24:1 (2000) ► pp.204–221

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Jaklin Kornfilt. Turkish. Descriptive Grammars.London: Routledge, 1997.

Reviewed by
 | University of California, Davis
Published online: 26 June 2000
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.1.12org
References (28)
References
Comrie, Bernard; and Smith, Norval. 1977. “Questionnaire”. Lingua 42/1: 1–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demircan, Ömer. 1987. “Emphatic reduplication in Turkish”. In: Boeschoten, H.; and Verhoeven, L. (eds), Studies in Modern Turkish: proceedings of the 3rd conference on Turkish 24–41. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatibolu, Vecihe. 1973. Pekiştirme ve kurallarn. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon; and Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1995. “Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish”. Language 71/4: 763–793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1990. “Prosodic minimality in Japanese”. In: Ziolkowski, Michael; Noske, Manuela; et al. (eds), Papers from the twenty-sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Volume 2: the parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology 213–39. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itô, Junko and Hankamer, Jorge. 1989. “Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish”. In: Itô, Junko; and Runner, Jeff (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz 61–69. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1986. “Locating Turkish devoicing”. In: Dalrymple, Mary; Goldberg, Jeffrey; Hanson, Kristin; Inman, Michael; Piñon, Chris; and Wechsler, Stephen (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 119–128. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “Lexical morphology and phonology”. In: I. -S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1961. The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Prince, Alan. 1993. “Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction”. To be published by MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mester, Armin. 1994. “The quantitative trochee in Latin”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 121: 1–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. “The evolution of noun incorporation”. Language 60/4: 847–894. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “On the nature of noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 32–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Lexical phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. “Cyclic and noncyclic phonological effects in a declarative grammar”. Booij, G.; and van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of morphology 1997: 179–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sezer, Engin. 1981. “The k/0 alternation in Turkish”. In Clements, George N. (ed.), Harvard studies in phonology 354–382. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1990. “Predicting rule domains in the phrasal phonology”. In: Inkelas, Sharon; and Zec, Draga (eds), The phonology-syntax connection 289–312. Chicago: CSLI Publications and the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. A grammar of Slave. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1986 .”Some notes on noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 19–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta. 1989. The phonology-morphology interface: cycles, levels, and words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 1997. The phonology of Armenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1998. “Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology”. Lapointe, S. G.; Brentari, D. K.; and Farrell, P. M. (eds), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax 216–246. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl; and Abbott, Barbara. 1978. “The k/0 alternation in Turkish: some experimental evidence for its productivity”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 71: 35–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 1994. Parsing below the segment in a constraint based framework. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue