Cover not available

Article published In: Areal Effects on Argument-Coding Patterns
Edited by Daria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov and Sergey Say
[Studies in Language 49:4] 2025
► pp. 858–893

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Variation in valency patterns across Romani dialects is primarily shaped by contact languages

ORCiD logo with link | Universität Potsdam
ORCiD logo with link | Universität Potsdam
Published online: 22 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23067.koz
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of language contact on valency patterns by comparing Romani dialects with their contact languages. Due to their wide dispersion and extensive contact with diverse European languages, Romani dialects provide an excellent testing ground for exploring the interplay of genealogical and areal factors in valency encoding. Using data from the Romani morpho-syntax database (RMS) and BivalTyp, a typological database of bivalent verbs, we analyzed valency patterns in 43 predicates across 119 Romani varieties and 18 contact languages. Despite their relatively recent divergence (600–700 years), Romani dialects exhibit greater variation in valency patterns than some genealogical groups with a 2000-year history. These patterns align more closely with current geographic distribution and contact languages than with traditional genealogical classifications. The findings suggest that language contact is the primary driver of rapid changes in Romani valency systems, as some dialects resemble their contact languages more than other Romani varieties.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Setting the stage
    • 1.2Valency patterns: Definition and challenges
    • 1.3Language background
    • 1.4Research questions
  • 2.Data and methodology
    • 2.1The Romani morpho-syntax database (RMS)
    • 2.2The BivalTyp database
    • 2.3Preparing the dataset: Selection of verbs and annotation
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Variation in valency patterns across Romani dialects
    • 3.2Clustering of Romani dialects
    • 3.3Romani dialects and contact languages: (dis)similarities in valency class systems
      • 3.3.1The challenge
      • 3.3.2Transitivity prominence
      • 3.3.3Locus of (non-)intransitivity
  • 4.Conclusion and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (62)
References
Apresjan, Jurij D. 1967. Eksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola [Experimental study of the Russian verb]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2014. An empirical assessment of semantic role types in non-default case assignment. Studies in Language 38(3). 485–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blume, Kerstin. 1998. A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements. Linguistics 36(2). 253–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert. 2007. The differentiation of the Romani dialects. STUF — Language Typology and Universals 60(4). 314–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert & Birgit Igla. 2004. Kommentierter Dialektatlas des Romani. T. 1–2. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath, Andrej Malchukov & Søren Wichmann. 2015. Introduction. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 11, 3–26. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily & Peter Bakker. 2011. External possession in Romani. In Viktor Elšík & Yaron Matras (eds.), Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase, 151–185. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1993. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, 55–72. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Event structure in argument linking. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Leeuw, Jan & Patrick Mair. 2009. Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R. Journal of Statistical Software 31(3). 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dediu, Dan & Michael Cysouw. 2013. Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison of seven methods. PLoS One 8(1). e55009. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dexter, Eric, Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens & Stephen M. Bollens. 2018. The trouble with stress: A flexible method for the evaluation of nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 161. 434–443.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 671. 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elšík, Viktor & Michael Beníšek. 2020. Romani dialectology. In Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 389–427. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galili, Tal. 2015. dendextend: an R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 31(22). 3718–3720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2020. Borrowing matter and pattern in morphology. An overview. Morphology 301. 263–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gast, Volker & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. 2022. Patterns of persistence and diffusibility in the European lexicon. Linguistic Typology 26(2). 403–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Micahel Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1141. E8822–E8829. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2019. Valency and transitivity in contact: An overview. Journal of Language Contact 12(1). 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartman, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies. Studies in Language 38(3). 463–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 11, 131–147. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1985. A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassambara, Alboukadel. 2023. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.6.0. Available at: [URL] (last access 4 March 2025).
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In Miriam Butt & Willem Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments, 265–307. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1994. L’actance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica 36(3–4). 141–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, 73–117. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2006. Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: constraining co-variation. In Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Case, valency and transitivity, 175–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2015. Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: parameters of variation. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 1. Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, 73–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
and Leipzig Valency Classes Project team. 2015. Leipzig Questionnaire on valency classes. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. I. Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, 27–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2002. Romani: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The classification of Romani dialects: A geographic-historical perspective. In Dieter W. Halwachs, Barbara Schrammel & Gerd Ambrosch (eds.), General and applied Romani linguistics, 7–26. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020[2009]. Language contact. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Viktor Elšík. 2001–2016. Romani Morpho-Syntax Database. University of Manchester. Available at [URL] (last access 22 August 2023)
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Introduction. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–13. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, Christopher White & Viktor Elšík. 2009. The Romani Morpho-Syntax (RMS) database. In Martin Everaert, Simon Musgrave & Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.), The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies, 329–362. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Anton Tenser (eds.). 2020. The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, Márton A. Baló, Kirill Kozhanov, Daniele Viktor Leggio & Jakob Wiedner. 2022. Romani. In Lenore Grenoble, Pia Lane & Unn Røyneland (eds.), Linguistic minorities in Europe online. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria. 2019. World-wide comparative evidence for calquing of valency patterns in creoles. Journal of Language Contact 12 (1). 191–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murawaki, Yugo & Kenji Yamauchi. 2018. A statistical model for the joint inference of vertical stability and horizontal diffusibility of typological features. Journal of Language Evolution 3(1). 13–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1975. Verbal semantics and sentence construction. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 343–353.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Diachronically stable structural features. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical Linguistics, 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 337–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oksanen, Jari, Gavin L. Simpson, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Roeland Kindt, Pierre Legendre, Peter R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, Peter Solymos, M. Henry, H. Stevens, Eduard Szoecs, Helene Wagner, Matt Barbour, Michael Bedward, Ben Bolker, Daniel Borcard, Gustavo Carvalho, Michael Chirico, Miquel De Caceres, Sebastien Durand, Heloisa Beatriz Antoniazi Evangelista, Rich FitzJohn, Michael Friendly, Brendan Furneaux, Geoffrey Hannigan, Mark O. Hill, Leo Lahti, Dan McGlinn, Marie-Helene Ouellette, Eduardo Ribeiro Cunha, Tyler Smith, Adrian Stier, Cajo J. F. Ter Braak, James Weedon, Tuomas Borman. 2025. Package ‘vegan’. R package version 2.6-10. Available at: [URL] (last access 28 March 2025).
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: [URL] (last access 4 March 2025).
Say, Sergey. 2014. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1). 116–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Markirovanie aktantov dvuxmestnyx predikatov: predvaritel’nye itogi tipologicheskogo issledovanija [Argument marking of two-place predicates: preliminary results of a typological study]. In Sergey Say (ed.), Valentnostnye klassy dvuxmestnyx predikatov v raznostrukturnyx jazykax [Valency classes of two-place predicates in structurally different languages], 557–616. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed.). 2020–. BivalTyp: Typological Database of Bivalent Verbs and Their Encoding Frames. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS. Available at [URL] (last access 22 August 2023).
Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A., Björn Wiemer, Eleni Bužarovska, Martina Ivanová, Maxim Makartsev, Stefan Savić, Dmitri Sitchinava, Karolína Skwarska & Mladen Uhlik. 2022. Areal and diachronic trends in argument flagging across Slavic. In Eystein Dahl (ed.), Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, 300–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skirgård, Hedvig et al. 2023. Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Sci. Adv. 91. eadg6175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2020. Copying of argument structure: A gap in borrowing scales and a new approach to model contact-induced change. In Bridget Drinka (ed.), Historical Linguistics 2017. Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July — 4 August 2017, 413–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 2004. Issues in case-marking. In Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative subjects. Vol. 21, 197–208. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Belle, William & Willy van Langendonck (eds.). 1996. The dative. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren & Eric W. Holman. 2009. Temporal stability of linguistic typological features. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. 2015. Diachronic stability and typology. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 212–224. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2011. Typological variation in grammatical relations. Leipzig: University of Leipzig Ph.D. dissertation.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Alfimova, Daria, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say
2025. Areal effects on argument-coding patterns. Studies in Language 49:4 ► pp. 757 ff. DOI logo
Makartsev, Maxim, Max Wahlström & Anastasia Escher
2025. Lability in Balkan Slavic. Studies in Language 49:4 ► pp. 894 ff. DOI logo
Say, Sergey
2025. Bivalent verb classes across Slavic: areal and genealogical patterns. Russian Linguistics 49:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue