Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 48:4 (2024) ► pp.813–850

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility

ORCiD logo with link | Tohoku University
 | Tohoku University
Published online: 14 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23010.gon
Abstract
The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, . 2022. Morphosyntax: constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential, productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese, and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech. Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Theoretical framework
    • 2.2Data collection
  • 3.Action reference construction in Chinese
    • 3.1Two subconstructions of action reference construction
    • 3.2Structural coding and behavioral potential
    • 3.3Productivity and semantic shift
  • 4.Typological features strengthening lexical flexibility in Chinese
    • 4.1Encoding of arguments in action reference constructions
    • 4.2Lack of inflectional morphological changes
    • 4.3Identifiability of a topic and referring phrase
  • 5.Implications for typology of lexical flexibility
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (66)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Volume 31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, David. 2013. Unidirectional flexibility and the noun-verb distinction in Lushootseed. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 185–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Word class systems between flexibility and rigidity: an integrative approach. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 275–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2008. Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12(1), 45–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology 20(2), 377–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Word classes in Radical Construction Grammar. In Eva van Lier (ed.), The Oxford handbook of word classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: [URL] (last access Oct 31 2023).
. 2022. Morphosyntax: constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Eva van Lier. 2012. Language universals without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2). 57–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Matthew. 2002. Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo PhD dissertation.
Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada. 2005. Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 91. 351–390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Mei. 2006. Grammaticalization of shuō (say) in Beijing Mandarin: From lexical verb to subordinator (北京话里《说》的语法化—从言説动词到从句标记). Chinese Journal of Dialects (中国方言学报) 11. 107–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fu, Jingqi. 1994. On deriving Chinese derived nominals: evidence for V-to-N raising. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
Gong, Liwei & Satoshi Uehara. 2023. Encoding of nominal predication constructions: a typological investigation in verb-initial languages. Linguistic Typology Online Available at: (Last access Nov 27 2023).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Rui. 2002. Studies in Modern Chinese word classes (现代汉语词类研究). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1), 119–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2). 91–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In Thomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories of everything: In honor of Edward Keenan. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 171. 109–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Parts-of-speech systems and morphological types. ACLC Working Papers 2(31). 31–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Parts-of-speech systems as a basic typological determinant. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 31–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40(3). 527–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Marieke Valstar. 2010. Parts-of-speech systems and lexical subclasses. Linguistics in Amsterdam 3(1). 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, Thomas M. 1995. Lushootseed Reader with Introductory Grammar. Volume 1: Four stories from Edward Sam. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Lushootseed Reader. Volume 3: Four more stories from Martha Lamont. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Peter Kenneth Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical functions in Austronesian languages, 247–293. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren & Dingxu Shi. 2016. A reference grammar of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Shi-Zhe, Jing Jin & Dingxu Shi. 2016. Adjectives and adjective phrases. In Chu-Ren Huang & Dingxu Shi (eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese, 276–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 2020. Xinhua Dictionary (新华字典), 12th edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2009. Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35(1), 1–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Launey, Michel. 2004. The features of omnipredicativity in Classical Nahuatl. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 57(1). 49–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Jinxi & Shiru Liu. 1959. A Chinese grammar textbook (汉语语法教材). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Nominalization / verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. Muenchen: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ngo, Binh. 2021. Vietnamese: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 2: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Fe T. Otanes. 1983. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2016. Nouns and verbs (名词与动词). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Nouns and verbs: evolution of grammatical forms. In Peng Gang & Wang Feng (eds.), New horizons in evolutionary linguistics (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 27), 222–253. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2018. Nominalization in crosslinguistic perspective. In Prashant Pardeshi & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics, 345–410. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil, Alexander Adelaar, Dwi Noverini Djenar & Michael C. Ewing. 2012. Indonesian reference grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Lier, Eva. 2016. Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 197–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vapnarsky, Valentina. 2013. Is Yucatec Maya an omnipredicative language? Predication, the copula and focus constructions. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 66(1). 40–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Chang’an. 2012. The historical formation of the blending pattern of nouns and verbs in Chinese (汉语名词、动词交融模式的历史形成). Studies of the Chinese language (中国语文) 11. 17–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xun, Endong, Gaoqi Rao, Xiaoyue Xiao & Jiaojiao Zang. 2016. The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of Big Data (大数据背景下BCC语料库的研制). Corpus Linguistics (语料库语言学) 3(1). 93–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeh, Hsin-hung. 2020. Chinese verb phrases: Continuum of patterns with different lexical statuses. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
Yin, Hui. 2010. The so-called Chinese VV compounds: A continuum between lexicon and syntax. In Melinda Heijl (eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Available at: [URL] (Last access 26 January 2024).
Zhang, Yisheng. 2012. On the selection of adverbial markers in Contemporary Chinese (现代汉语副词状语的标记选择). Chinese Linguistics (汉语学报) 401. 32–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Lectures on grammar (语法讲义). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Questions and answers on grammar (语法答问). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zulpukarov, Kapar, Semetei Amiraliev, Gulzhamal Kozhoeva, Gulzat Aipova & Chunarkul Asperdieva
2025. The role of SASYS in phonological adaptations: a comparative study of Turkic-Chinese lexical elements. Global Chinese 11:1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue