Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 47:3 (2023) ► pp.505–525
Copula to negator
Grammaticalization of the copula #ni in Tibeto-Burman languages
Published online: 1 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21065.del
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21065.del
Abstract
Auwera, Johan van der & Frens Vossen. 2017. Kiranti
double negation: A copula conjecture. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 40(1). 40–58. identify an intriguing shift from a
copula to a negative marker in the Tibeto-Burman Kiranti group, and discuss it as a possible example of Jespersen’s Cycle. This
paper traces a fuller history of the copula #ni, and presents an account of its association with negation, which
is attested in several other Tibeto-Burman languages besides Kiranti. In most Tibeto-Burman languages the equational copula is
“optional”, occurring in affirmative sentences only with a contrastive or emphatic sense. For this reason copulas often develop
into sentence-final stance markers. Since negation is morphologically marked on verbs, a negated equational sentence requires an
overt copula which can be negated. This paper presents data showing how this association of the presence of a copula with negation
has resulted in the negative sense becoming associated with and, in a few cases, becoming the direct meaning of the erstwhile
copula.
Keywords: negation, copula, grammaticalization, Tibeto-Burman, Sino-Tibetan, Trans-Himalayan
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and background
- 1.1The copula #ni
- 1.2Equational copulas and verbless sentences in Tibeto-Burman languages
- 2.Intermediate grammaticalization stages
- 2.1Copula #ni as tense/aspect marking
- 2.2Grammaticalization of stance values: From copula to sentence-final particle
- 3.Grammaticalization of negation
- 3.1Relict negative copulas
- 3.2#ni and negation in Kiranti
- 3.3#ni and negation in South Central
- 4.The copula and negation
- Data sources for tables
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (54)
Arden, Michelle. 2010. A
phonetic, phonological, and morphosyntactic analysis of the Mara language. San Diego: San Diego State University MA thesis. (accessed 22/01/2012 at [URL]).
Auwera, Johan van der. 2009. The Jespersen
cycles. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.) Cyclical
change, 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Auwera, Johan van der, Olga Krasnoukhova & Frens Vossen. 2022. Intertwining
the negative cycles. In Ljuba Veselinova & Arja Hamari (eds.), The
negative existential cycle from a historical-comparative
perspective, 557–596. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Auwera, Johan van der & Frens Vossen. 2017. Kiranti
double negation: A copula conjecture. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 40(1). 40–58.
Bai, Junwei. 2019. A
grammar of Munya. Douglas: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi. 1993. Mizo
syntax. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.
Chelliah, Shobhana, David Peterson, Tyler Utt, Evaline Blair & Sumshot Khular. 2019. Lamkang
verb conjugation. Himalayan
Linguistics 18(1). 8–25.
. 2011. Finite
structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman
languages. In Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological
perspectives, 343–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2021. Classifying
Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages. In Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (eds.), The
languages and linguistics of mainland Southeast
Asia, 207–223. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. in
press. Argument indexation (verb agreement) in South Central
(Kuki-Chin). Himalayan Linguistics.
. to
appear. The Trans-Himalayan copula
#ni. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics.
Ebert, Karen. 1994. The
structure of Kiranti languages. (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Nr.
13). Zurich: Universität Zurich.
Evans, Jonathan & Dhrubajit Langthasa. to
appear. Dimasa language: Structure and
texts. Taipei: Language and Linguistics (Academia Sinica).
Genetti, Carol. 1988. Notes
on the structure of the Sunwari transitive verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 11(2). 62–92.
. 2011. Nominalization
in Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. In Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological
perspectives, 163–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T.. 1978. On
understanding grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hanson, Ola. 1917. A
hand-book of the Kachin or Jinghpaw
language. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A
grammar of Eastern Geshiza. Helsinki: University of Helsinki PhD dissertation.
Huang, Chenglong 黄成龍. 2004. A reference grammar of the Puxi variety
of Qiang. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong PhD dissertation.
Huang, Huade. 2020. Evidentiality
and engagement in Kua’nsi. Presented at the 53rd
International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of North
Texas.
Konnerth, Linda. 2018. The
historical phonology of Monsang (Northwestern South-Central / “Kuki-Chin”): A case of reduction in phonological
complexity. Himalayan
Linguistics 17(1). 19–49.
Konnerth, Linda & Wanglar, Koninglee. 2019. Person
indexation in Monsang from a diachronic perspective. Himalayan
Linguistics 18(1). 54–77.
Kurabe, Keita. 2016. A
grammar of Jinghpaw, from northern
Burma. Kyoto: Kyoto University PhD dissertation.
Lidz, Liberty. 2010. A
descriptive grammar of Yongning Na
(Mosuo). Austin: University of Texas PhD dissertation.
Lowes [Hyslop], Gwendolyn. 2006. Some
comparative notes on Tibeto-Burman copulas. Presented at
the 39th International Conferences on Sino-Tibetan Languages and
Linguistics.
Matisoff, James. 1985. God
and the Sino-Tibetan copula, with some good news concerning selected Tibeto-Burman
rhymes. Journal of Asian and African
Studies 291. 1–81.
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard
negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological
perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Nagila, Kedar Bilash. 2013. Negation: Evidence from the
Dura language. Nepalese
Linguistics 281. 95–99.
Noonan, Michael. 1997. Versatile
nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays
on language function and language
type, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paudyal, Netra Prasad. 2015. Aspects of Chintang
syntax. Zürich: University of Zürich PhD dissertation.
So-Hartmann, Helga. 2009. A
descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project, University of California.
Teo, Amos. 2019. Investigating
Differential Case Marking in Sümi, a language of Nagaland, using language documentation and experimental
methods. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.
Thurgood, Graham. 1982. The
Sino-Tibetan copula *wəy(o). Cahiers de linguistique Asie
Orientale 11(1). 65–81.
Yu, Dominic. 2012. Proto-Ersuic. Ph.D. dissertation, Berkeley: University of California.
Zakaria, Muhammad. 2017. A
grammar of Hyow. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University PhD dissertation.
