Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 47:2 (2023) ► pp.392–421
Dogon pseudo-subjects with or without true subjects
Published online: 13 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21047.hea
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21047.hea
Abstract
Dogon pseudo-subjects are bare meteorological, temporal-environmental, and partonymic nouns of low
referentiality/specificity that occur in fixed noun-verb collocations. The pseudo-subject controls the choice of verb in all
cases, but it fails to behave like a true subject in linear position, in a quotative-subject construction, or in
pronominal-subject agreement. The pseudo-subject is the sole nominal in these meteorological and temporal collocations, but in
partonymic collocations it co-occurs with a true subject denoting the possessor-experiencer. The latter has all of the clear
subject properties except controlling the choice of verb. Pseudo-subjects have some similarities with, but are distinct from, a
range of typologically familiar phenomena including impersonal subjects, direct objects, possessums stranded by possessor raising,
East Asian-style second subjects or post-topic subjects, incorporated nouns, and adverbial adjuncts. They can be classified as
pseudo-incorporated nominals if this category is broad enough to include subject-like as well as object-like nominals. The
relevant constructions are easily modelled in construction grammars, but not in arboreal syntax.
Keywords: Dogon, subject, pseudo-subject, impersonal, meteorological, partonym
Article outline
- 1.Impersonal subjects
- 2.Dogon clauses with pseudo-subjects and without true subjects
- 2.1Meteorological and temporal-environmental expressions
- 2.2Linear position of subjects and pseudo-subjects
- 2.3Quotative-subject phrases
- 2.4Switch reference
- 2.5Pronominal-subject agreement
- 3.Two-part Dogon clauses with pseudo-subjects and true subjects
- 3.1Partonymic collocations denoting somatic and emotional conditions
- 3.2Pronominal-subject agreement and linear order
- 3.3Quotative-subject phrases
- 3.4Switch reference
- 4.Verb subcategorization
- 5.Discussion: What are pseudo-subjects?
- 5.1Direct objects and unaccusatives?
- 5.2Chickasaw-style possessums stranded by possessor-raising?
- 5.3Japanese-style post-topic subjects?
- 5.4Asian-style “grammatical subjects”?
- 5.5Incorporated nouns?
- 5.6Adjuncts?
- 5.7Pseudo-incorporated nouns?
- 6.Construction grammar
- 7.Conclusion
- Contributions of co-authors
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (35)
Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke (eds.). 2015. The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. (Syntax & Semantics Vol. 40). Leiden: Brill.
Chun, Sun-Ae. 1985. Possessor ascension for multiple case sentences. In: Susumu Kuno, John Whitman, Ik-Hwan Lee & Young-Se Kang (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 11. 30–39. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
Creissels, Denis & Djibril Dramé. 2014. Transitivity and incorporation in Soninke. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 261. 37–54. ISBN 978-3-89645-726-4.
Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(1). 123–167.
Dyachkov, Vadim. MS. A grammar of Tomo Kan Dogon. Unpublished manuscript.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eriksen, Pål K., Seppo Kittila & Leena Kolehmainen. 2012. Weather and language. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(6).
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39) Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Heath, Jeffrey. 2015a. Grammar of Ben Tey (Dogon of Beni). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: [URL] (last access 28 May 2022). [URL] (last access 28 May 2022).
. 2015b. A grammar of Togo Kan (Dogon language family, Mali). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: [URL] (last access 28 May 2022). [URL] (last access 28 May 2022).
. 2016. A grammar of Nanga (Dogon language family, Mali). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: [URL] (last access 28 May 2022). [URL] (last access 28 May 2022).
Heath, Jeffrey & Laura McPherson. 2013. Tonosyntax and reference restriction in Dogon NPs. Language 89(2). 265–296.
Heath, Jeffrey & Vadim Dyachkov. 2015. Subject versus addressee in Dogon imperatives and hortatives. Studies in Language 39(3). 555–593.
Keine, Stefan. 2013. Deconstructing switch-reference. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(3). 767–826.
Langacker, Ronald. 2011. On the subject of impersonals. In Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion, 179–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langdon, Margaret & Pamela Munro. 1979. Subject and switch reference in Yuman. Folia Linguistica 131. 321–344.
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska (eds.). 2011a. Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2011b. Introduction. In Malchukov & Siewierska, (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(1). 53–197.
McPherson, Laura & Kirill Prokhorov. 2011. Structural correlates of ‘liver’ expressions in Dogon emotional vocabulary. In Gian Claudio Batic (ed.), Encoding emotions in African languages, 38–55. Munich: LINCOM Europa. ISBN 9783862880492.
Mettouchi, Amina & Mauro Tosco. 2011. Impersonal constructions and theticity: The case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.), 307–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Munro, Pamela & Lynn Gordon. 1982. Syntactic relations in western Muskogean: A typological perspective. Language 58(1). 81–115.
Nam, Jeesun. 2015. An empirical study of Korean adjectival predicates that license double nominative constructions. Language and Linguistics 16(3). 397–429. [URL] (last access 3 June 2022)
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting, 157–189. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1986. On weather verbs. Papers of the Regional Meeting 22(1), 195–215. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Schütze, Carson. 2001. On Korean “case stacking”: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul. The Linguistic Review 181. 193–232. (last access 3 June 2022)
Shen Jiaxuan. 1987. Subject function and double subject construction in Mandarin Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 16(2). 195–211.
Yoon, James H. 2009. The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions. In Yukinori Takubo, Tomohide Kinuhata, Szymon Grzelak & Kayo Nagai (eds.), Japanese-Korean Linguistics 161. 64–83. ISBN 1575865785. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2022).
Zheltov, Alexander. 2020. Incorporation and “formal incorporation” in analytic languages: Mande languages and typology of incorporation. Language in Africa 1(4). 98–114. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2022).
