Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 47:2 (2023) ► pp.350–391
Markedness and voicing gaps in stop and fricative inventories
Published online: 8 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21017.wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21017.wan
Abstract
This study investigates the hypothesis that marked sounds are more likely to be gaps in a sound inventory. A gap is defined as an absence of an [α voice] stop or fricative when the [−α voice] counterpart exists. Different formulations of markedness are tested and evaluated on whether they label the gaps as more marked than attested sounds. Results show an overall success of markedness based on typological attestedness of sounds in labeling gaps as more marked. However, the success of markedness based on aerodynamics and cross-linguistic phonological processes is limited to stops and fricatives, respectively. Analyses also show that gaps in attested inventories are more likely to be marked than gaps from randomized artificial inventories. This discrepancy between attested and artificial inventories shows how markedness, feature economy, and symmetry interact in shaping sound systems of human languages.
Keywords: markedness, gaps, sound inventories, phonological typology, voicing
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Markedness
- 3.Method
- 3.1Inventories and feature systems
- 3.1.1Attested inventories
- 3.1.2Artificial inventories
- 3.1.3Feature systems
- 3.2Gaps
- 3.2.1Identifying gaps
- 3.2.2Generating gap-foil pairs
- 3.2.3Statistics of gaps and gap-foil pairs
- 3.3Modeling the identity of gaps through markedness
- 3.3.1phonological markedness
- 3.3.2aerodynamic markedness
- 3.3.3Typological frequency
- 3.3.4Voicing likelihood
- 3.1Inventories and feature systems
- 4.Results
- 4.1Model comparison in attested inventories
- 4.2Are models’ success unique for attested inventories?
- 4.3Coverage of correct predictions
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Note
References
References (43)
Chanard, Christian. 2006. Systèmes alphabétiques des langues africaines. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 June 2022).
Crothers, John H., James P. Lorentz, Donald A. Sherman & Marilyn M. Vihman. 1979. Handbook of phonological data from a sample of the world’s languages: A report of the Stanford Phonology Archive. Stanford: Stanford University.
De Lacy, Paul V. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst PhD dissertation.
De Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dorman, Michael F., Michael Studdert-Kennedy & Lawrence J. Raphael. 1977. Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues. Perception & Psychophysics 22(2). 109–122.
Dunbar, Ewan & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2016. Geometric constraints on human speech sound inventories. Frontiers in Psychology 71. 1061.
Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. 1975. On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. Lingua 35(3–4). 231–261.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.
1970. Some generalizations concerning glottalic consonants, especially implosives. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(2). 123–145.
Grignon, Anne-Marie. (1984). Phonologie lexicale tri-dimensionnelle du Japonais. Montréal: Université de Montréal PhD dissertation.
Hall, T Alan. 1997. The phonology of coronals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, & Sebastian Bank. 2020. Glottolog database 4.3. Available at: [URL] (last access 22 June 2022).
Hartell, Rhonda L., (ed.). 1993. Alphabets des langues africaines. Dakar: UNESCO and Société Internationale de Linguistique.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of linguistics 42(1). 25–70.
Johnson, Orville E. & Stephen H. Levinsohn. 1990. Gramática secoya. Quito: Inst. Lingüístico de Verano.
Lahiri, Aditi & Henning Reetz. 2010. Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics 38(1). 44–59.
Lenth, Russell V. 2016. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69(1). 1–33.
Lindblom, Björn, Randy Diehl, Sang-Hoon Park & Giampiero Salvi. 2011. Sound systems are shaped by their users: The recombination of phonetic substance. In G. Nick Clements & Rachid Ridouane (eds.), Where do phonological features come from, 67–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindblom, Björn & Ian Maddieson. 1988. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Larry M. Hyman & Charles N. Li (eds.), Language, speech, and mind: Studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, 62–78. London: Routledge.
Mackie, Scott & Jeff Mielke. 2011. Feature economy in natural, random, and synthetic inventories. In G. Nick Clements & Rachid Ridouane (eds.), Where do phonological features come from, 43–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maddieson, Ian & Kristin Precoda. 1989. Updating UPSID. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(S1). S19–S19.
Michael, Lev, Tammy Stark & Will Chang. 2012. South American Phonological Inventory Database v1.1.2. Survey of California and other Indian languages digital resource. Berkeley: University of California.
Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy (eds.). 2019. PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
Nikolaev, Dmitry, Andrey Nikulin & Anton Kukhto. 2015. The database of Eurasian phonological inventories. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 June 2022).
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech, 189–216. New York: Springer.
Ohala, John J. & Carol J. Riordan. 1979. Passive vocal tract enlargement during voiced stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65(S1). S23–S23.
Ohde, Ralph N. & Kenneth N. Stevens. 1983. Effect of burst amplitude on the perception of stop consonant place of articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74(3). 706–714.
Pedregosa, Fabian, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos & David Cournapeau. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. The Journal of machine Learning research 121: 2825–2830.
Piñeros, Carlos-Eduardo. 2003. Accounting for the instability of Palenquero voiced stops. Lingua 113(12). 1185–1222.
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwells. (Rutgers Technical Reports TR-2. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science [also Rutgers Optimality Archive 537]).
Round, Erich. 2019. Australian phonemic inventories contributed to PHOIBLE 2.0: Essential explanatory notes. Available at: (last access 22 June 2022).
Sherman, Donald. 1975. Stop and fricative systems: a discussion of paradigmatic gaps and the question of language sampling. Working Papers on Language Universals 171. 1–33.
Smith, Bruce L. 1975. Effects of vocalic context, place of articulation, and speaker’s sex on “voiced” stop consonant production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 58(S1). S61–S61.
Thompson, Bill & Bart de Boer. 2017. Structure and abstraction in phonetic computation: Learning to generalise among concurrent acquisition problems. Journal of Language Evolution 2(1). 94–112.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeevich. 1969. Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Verhoef, Tessa, Simon Kirby & Bart De Boer. 2014. Emergence of combinatorial structure and economy through iterated learning with continuous acoustic signals. Journal of Phonetics, 431. 57–68.
