Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 48:1 (2024) ► pp.1–64
Early Vedic compounds
A typological reappraisal
Published online: 7 February 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20069.bia
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20069.bia
Abstract
Despite a longstanding tradition of studies in Sanskrit compounds, a description that enables comparisons in
cross-linguistic perspective has not yet been worked out. The present article follows classificatory criteria introduced by
Bisetto & Scalise (Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise. 2005. The
classification of compounds. Lingue e
linguaggio 4(2): 319–320., . 2009. The
classification of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 34–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) and
sketches a typology of compounds in the most archaic variety of Sanskrit, Early Vedic, as transmitted by the
RigVeda. Analyzing compounds on the basis of the grammatical relations holding between their constituents
provides a classification into coordinate, subordinate, and attributive compounds, with the endocentric/exocentric divide cutting
across all classes. In order to identify the position of Early Vedic compounds on the syntax-morphology continuum,
the article investigates the degree of cohesiveness at the level of morphology, prosody, syntax, and semantics. With this respect,
the RigVeda offers a varied picture where relics of archaic, less cohesive forms occur side-to-side with more
productive and word-like ones.
Keywords: compounds, Early Vedic, typology, coordinate, subordinate, attributive, cohesiveness
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.General issues of compounding in Early Vedic
- 3.Relation between constituents: A new classification of Early Vedic compounds
- 3.1Bisetto & Scalise’s classification of compound types
- 3.2Coordinate compounds
- 3.3Subordinate compounds
- 3.3.1Verbal-nexus subordinate compounds
- 3.3.2Ground subordinate compounds
- 3.3.3Prepositional compounds
- 3.4ATAP compounds
- 3.4.1Attributive compounds
- 3.4.2Appositive compounds
- 3.5Reduplicative compounds
- 3.6Borderline cases
- 3.7Interim summary
- 4.Cohesiveness
- 4.1Morphological cohesiveness
- 4.2Prosodic cohesiveness
- 4.3Do syntactic constraints apply to members of compounds?
- 4.4Compositionality of meaning
- 4.5Recursivity
- 4.6Interim summary
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (90)
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco & Isa Sarı. 2018. Towards
a typology of coordinating compounds in Turkish. Folia
Linguistica 52(2): 319–349.
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Nicola Grandi & Bernhard Wälchli. 2010. Coordination
in compounding. In Irene Vogel & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Cross-disciplinary
issues in
compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1998. Is
there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it
productive? Linguistics 36(3): 403–422.
. 2001. Compounding. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard. König, Wulf Oesterre & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language
typology and language
universals, 695–707. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2009. Typology
of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer, The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 540–482. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2017. Compounds
and compounding. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise. 2005. The
classification of compounds. Lingue e
linguaggio 4(2): 319–320.
. 2009. The
classification of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 34–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding
and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky & Oskar E. Pfeiffer (eds.), Morphology
and its demarcation. Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February
2004, 109–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brugmann, Karl. 1889. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, Band 2.1: Wortbildungslehre (Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre). Strassburg: Trübner.
Casaretto, Antje, & Carolin Schneider. 2015. Vedic
local particles at the syntax-semantics interface. In Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language
change at the syntax-semantics
interface, 223–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Clackson, James. 2002. Composition
in Indo-European languages. Transactions of the Philological
Society 100(2): 163–167.
Corbett, Greville G. 1987. The morphology/syntax interface:
Evidence from possessive adjectives in
Slavonic. Language 631: 299–345.
Ditrich, Tamara. 2016. Historical
development and typology of dvandva compounds in the
RigVeda. In Joel Brereton (ed.), The
Vedas. Indian culture and history. Proceedings of the Third International Vedic
Workshop (Austin, TX, 2007), 75–92. Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina.
. 2018. Stylistic
analysis of coordinative nominal constructions for dual deities in the
RigVeda. In Joel Brereton, & Theodore N. Proferes (eds.), Creating
the Veda, living the Veda: Selected Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit
Conference, 81–110. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.
Gotō, Toshifumi, Jared Klein & Velizar Sadovski. 2013. Old
Indo-Aryan morphology and its Indo-Iranian
background. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Goyal, Pawan, Gérard Huet, Amba Kulkarni, Peter Scharf & Ralph Bunker. 2012. A
distributed platform for Sanskrit processing. In Martin Kay & Christian Boitet, Proceedings
of
COLING 2012, 1011–1028. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.
Grassmann, Hermann. 1873. Wörterbuch
zum Rig-Veda. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz. Available at [URL] (last
access 9 October
2022).
Grestenberger, Laura. 2014. Zur
Funktion des Nominalsuffixes *-i- im Vedischen und
Urindogermanischen. In Norbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds.), Das
Nomen im Indogermanischen. Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen
Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
. 2017. On
“i-substantivizations” in Vedic compounds. In Bjarne Simmelkjær, Sandgaard Hansen, Adam Hyllested, Anders Richardt Jørgensen, Guus Kroonen, Jenny Helena Larsson, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander, Tobias Mosbæk Søborg, Usque ad radices:
Indo-European studies in honour of Birgit Anette
Olsen, 193–206. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
Guevara, Emiliano & Sergio Scalise. 2009. Searching
for universals in compounding. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni, & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals
of language
today, 101–128. Dordrecht: Springer.
Insler, Stanley. 1998. mitrā́vàrunā
or mitrā́ várunā? In Lisi Oliver, Jay H. Jasanoff, Harold Craig Melchert (eds.), Mir
Curad, Studies in honor of Calvert
Watkins, 285–290. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
Jacobi, Hermann. 1897. Compositum
und Nebensatz: Studien über die indogermanische
Sprachentwicklung. Bonn: Cohen.
Jamison, Stephanie W. 1979. Remarks on the expression of
agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European. Zeitschrift für vergleichende
Sprachforschung, 93(2.
H): 196–219.
2021. Online Commentary to RV
II. Available at [URL] (last access 9 October 2022).
Jamison, Stephanie W., & Brereton, Joel P. 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest
religious poetry of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 2009. Diachronic
perspectives. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 323–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kavka, Stanislav. 2009. Compounds
and idiomatology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 19–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. The
lexical phonology of Vedic accent. Cambridge (MA): Department of Linguistics, MIT.
. 2010. Dvandvas,
blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to
word. Language 86(2): 302–331.
Klein, Jared S. 2003. Āmreḍitas and
related constellations in the Rigveda. The Journal of the American Oriental
Society 123(4). 773–803.
Kobayashi, Masato. 2004. Historical
phonology of Old Indo-Aryan consonants (Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph
Series 42). Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Lühr, Rosemarie. 2004a. Contrastive
word stress in Vedic endo-and exocentric compounds. In Anita Steube (ed.), Information
structure. Theoretical and empirical
aspects, 163–194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2004b. Nominalkomposition
im Altindischen und Altgriechischen. In Elke Nowak (ed.), Komplexe
Wortstrukturen. Komposition, Inkorporation,
Polysynthese, 107–214. Berlin: TU Berlin.
Leumann, Manu, Johann Baptist Hofmann & Anton Szantyr. 1977. Lateinische
Grammatik. Vol. 11. München: Beck.
. 2005. English
word-formation processes. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook
of
word-formation. Vol. 1041, 375–428. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lieber, Rochelle, & Pavol Štekauer. 2009a. The
Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer. 2009b. Introduction:
Status and definition of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
compounding, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2017. Transitive
nouns and adjectives: Evidence from Early
Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matasović, Ranko. 2011. Slavic
possessive genitives and adjectives from historical point of
view. In Motoki Nomachi (ed.), The
grammar of possessivity in South Slavic languages: Synchronic and diachronic
perspectives, 1–12. Hokkaido: Hokkaido University Press.
Molina Muñoz, Adriana. 2013. Sanskrit
compounds and the architecture of the grammar. In Shu-Fen Chen & Benjamin Slade (eds.), Grammatica
et verba – Glamor and verve: Studies in South Asian, historical, and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Hans Henrich Hock
on the occasion of his seventy-fifth
birthday, 181–200. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
Nielsen Whitehead, Benedicte. 2012. Pickpocket
compounds from Latin to
Romance. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation.
van Nooten, Barend A. & Gary B. Holland. 1994. Rig
Veda: A metrically restored text with an introduction and notes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Oliphant, Samuel Grant. 1912. The Vedic dual: Part VI, the
elliptic dual; part VII, the dual dvandva. Journal of the American Oriental
Society 32(1). 33–57.
Olsen, Susan. 2001. Copulative
compounds. A closer look at the interface between morphology and
syntax. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook
of
morphology, 279–320. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2014. Delineating Derivation and Compounding. In Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 26–48. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2017. Synthetic compounds from a lexicalist perspective. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation 11:17-45.
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2018. Formation des composés de rection verbale du type védique bharádvāja-,
grec Φερέπτολις. Bulletin de la Société de
Linguistique de
Paris 113(1). 329–369.
Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto. 2018. When
grammaticalization does NOT occur: Prosody-syntax mismatches in
Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 35(2). 238–276.
Risch, Ernst. 1945. Griechische Komposita vom Typus μεσο-νύϰτιος und
ὁμο-γάστϱιος. Museum Helveticum 2.1: 15-27 (= 1981, 112-124).
Sadovski, Velizar. 2000. Die
exozentrischen Zusammensetzungen mit Vorderglied Präverb/Präposition im Rigveda: Entheos-Komposita und präpositionale
Rektionskomposita. In Bernard Forssman, & Robert Plath (eds.), Indoiranisch,
Iranisch und die Indogermanistik. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen
Gesellschaft, 455–473. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
. 2003. Dvandva,
tatpuruṣa and bahuvrīhi: On the Vedic sources for the names of the compound types in Pānini’s
grammar. Transactions of the Philological
Society 100(3). 351–402.
Scalise, Sergio, Antonietta Bisetto & Emiliano Guevara. 2005. Selection
in compounding and derivation. Morphology and its
demarcations 1331: 150.
Vogel, Irene & Sergio Scalise. 2010. Why
Compounding?. In Irene Vogel & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Cross-disciplinary
issues in compounding, 1–18. John Benjamins, 2010.
Scarlata, Salvatore & Paul Widmer. 2015. Vedische
exozentrische Komposita mit drei Relationen. Indo-Iranian
Journal 58(1): 26–47.
Schindler, Jochem. 1988. Zur
Theorie der Doppelpossessiva. With an introduction and comments by Martin
Peters. In Laura Grestenberger, Charles Reiss, Hannes A. Fellner & Gabriel Z. Pantillon (eds.), Ha!
Linguistic studies in honor of Mark R.
Hale, 332–338. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
. 1987. Zur
avestischen Kompositionslehre: aš.-
‘groβ’. In George Cardona & Norman H. Zide (eds.), Festschrift
for Henry Hoenigswald on the occasion of his 70th
birthday, 393–401. Tübingen: Günter Narr.
. 1997. Zur
internen Syntax der indogermanischen Nominalkomposita. In Crespo Emilio & José Luis García Ramón (eds.), Berthold
Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea
hoy, 537–540. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
Tan, Tamisha L. 2021. Syntax-Prosody Mismatches and
the Duality of Vedic Devatā Dvandva. In Rachel Soo, Una Y. Chow & Sander Nederveen (eds.), 38th
West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, 427–438. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2021.
Tichy, Eva. 2000. Indogermanistisches
Grundwissen für Studierende sprachwissenschaftlicher
Disziplinen. Hempen: Bremen.
Tribulato, Olga. 2013. Exocentric
ATAP compounds: the view from Early Ancient Greek. Lingue e
linguaggio 12(1).31–46.
Uhlich, Jürgen. 2002. Verbal
governing compounds (synthetics) in early Irish and other Celtic languages. Transactions of the
Philological
Society 100(3): 403–433.
von Schroeder, Leopold. 1874. Über
die formelle Unterscheidung der Redetheile im Griechischen und Lateinischen: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der
Nominalcomposita. Leipzig: KF Köhler.
Watkins, Calvert. 1969. Indogermanische
Grammatik. III/1 Geschichte der indogermanischen
Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Wüst, Walter. 1928. Stilgeschichte
und Chronologie des Rgveda. Liepzig: Deutsche morgenländische Gesellschaft.
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1905. Altindische
Grammatik. Vol. II, 11: Einleitung zur Wortlehre.
Nominalkomposition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Weber, Albrecht. 1852. The
Vâjasaneyi-Sanhitâ in the Mâdhyandina- and the Kâṇva-Çâkhâ with the Commentary of
Mahîdhara. Berlin: Dümmler.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
