Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 20:3 (1996) ► pp.696–708
Book review
. Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation? Studien zu einem Interaktionsfeld von Grammatik, Pragmatik und Sprachtypologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994. 365 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1996
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.3.11vel
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.3.11vel
References (14)
Abraham, W. 1992. “Clausal focus versus discourse rhema in German: A programmatic view”. In: Gilbers and Looyenga (eds), Language and Cognition. Yearbook University of Groningen 1–18. Groningen.
Chomsky, N. 1989. “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation”. Ms. (Also in Freidin, R. (ed.) 1991. Principles and parameters in comparative grammar 417–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)
1992. “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11].
Grimshaw, J. 1981. “Form, function and the language acquisition device”. In: Baker, C.; and McCarthy, J. (eds), The logical problem of language acquisition 165–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lenerz, J. 1993. “Zur Syntax der Pronomina im Deutschen”. In: Reis, M. (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 2571].
Pesetsky, D. 1987. “WH-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding”. In: Reuland, E.; and ter Meulen, A. (eds), The representation of (in-)definiteness 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pollack, J. -Y. 1989. “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 201: 365–424.
