Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 20:1 (1996) ► pp.163–189
Spoken Narrative and Preferred Clause Structure
Evidence from Modern Hebrew Discourse
Published online: 1 January 1996
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.1.07sut
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.1.07sut
This study examines the spontaneous oral narrative of three native speakers of Hebrew for overall clause structure in terms of number and type of arguments per clause, following DuBois' (1985) theory of Preferred Argument Structure. The results indicate that there exists a preferred shape for narrative clauses in Hebrew and that it strongly parallels that which has been found in the ergative Mayan language, Sacapultec, upon which Du Bois' study is based. As Hebrew is a nominative-accusative language, the results point to the universality of pragmatic-cognitive factors and information flow in discourse.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Tsunoda, Tasaku
Hacohen, Aviya, Olga Kagan & Dana Plaut
Jiang, Xiangyu & Liang Chen
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey
2015. Overcoming preferred argument structure in written French. Written Language & Literacy 18:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Vardi, Ruti
Fekete, Gabriella & Saïdi Darine
McGregor, William B.
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Matsumoto, Kazuko
Matsumoto, Kazuko
2022. NPs in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 163 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
